IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ohttp] OHTTP applications I've seen

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Fri, 30 July 2021 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B3B3A0C46 for <ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=nKX98sbu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=q7KK03NH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8yCQ5WB2ato for <ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F613A12C7 for <ohttp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440A65C00F0 for <ohttp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:49:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=juV5d my1NvYYwGLRcedfIAmN3t4V2Rne0GKj56EwZo8=; b=nKX98sbu7AxD4PkQptc83 JYKNP2GBuvN2Ext45/h8zcXmmDRBnPi+aI7wV+5PnX7h8RrAdfAHSo2RuAFuOiKR 43Kal+Fh2EzDsIBtfIxOmRrxV9jawceRbmJZaTQpH6F7YBzfvme5vpgWOk4kGRni cqd3XbOePPMae91cg3Sl7968bpZee3qy70on87FS9BuVLetNlL0n9/i/WuFqi41c RZpuAsXfHYIYYUtTWe5Og/7GBot5kKPd3C3SNwvic2/mih6rnmlernixI9JEHPXz KnO8sFSwHW9CQ+3/1LdZ599OsSlrW0RxN61Nr6sNfRFpzGsCQwp0qSiRhgXjkZ+X Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=juV5dmy1NvYYwGLRcedfIAmN3t4V2Rne0GKj56EwZ o8=; b=q7KK03NHI7CDKFl9UmFW3QDxxE7Ecxi1wRC9ZiyxuuuWgckz7nC8tDlHN ZUe+BxaLkN/5HqXHLNrpKQpAVKaQJlc56DIj13LxGfWd49aRBWs9HD7xFPqpqW6U ANV8urC3N+GEeFPfpPWloyz3MZR4+3P0QanqeWNIftOpNMwGDlQUkSd7s5gV4iH5 03RUqOpQQpLtxtGHT38q5+/V7SUk75Kwk6fscAplvGl76Z8rbRZrOHte9vcMwH9T b27NI5Zf01K40D4OhVIME0OBiMxyT8JAoT9yZ6/iF7D7GLoumcxhuuIoh9iQMzTM gM6tlOxlXB03AOtYH5FpKMWMJoqRg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jUwDYYnL-Ws4vyvzSTCvEusJ-bvGw6URFR1hp-PFR_DEbQ_guRLmCQ> <xme:jUwDYX3beh5TYPVkveSjQBao95lE4xgBGDfydTmw8h7LO_9-RFagdUzCuzGYA60N9 5p64t2eFeGOkv-XwD4>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheeggddvudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqh ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgjeeuudeiffeltdegle ehjedvtedtjeduudehgfegfefgkefgueeiteegffdttdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvg ht
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:jUwDYWoaHhAlJG5mwamIFRmpWCbaUH0oMbPZ-ZwnWH1shtq1ye_EUw> <xmx:jUwDYUnnJ3Pjo_NnHUFb5kS3h_ILbTLjcB9EX7VJoeM5rQKeIuIc1Q> <xmx:jUwDYW3UWKPkl4fLAnIIQMuGPxvhJ5-xcMonIdt0Iq1y6h6oEGkEdQ> <xmx:jkwDYXC-uh77peSFwQ54g1cHI7uYFiKH8zJ3IgAzAt2FXyfp43W1YA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 93AE23C0471; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:49:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-545-g7a4eea542e-fm-20210727.001-g7a4eea54
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <ed27ceb5-b4c4-427f-8b5b-0c85b6541143@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <acecb9f1-d8c9-959d-0334-e0533bfa3572@lear.ch>
References: <CACsn0ckC9trR_HsFfn37=+rTTBhe-Z_hGiZJZ6GWPXiS_eanZw@mail.gmail.com> <2111623045.1384.1627468504245@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <acecb9f1-d8c9-959d-0334-e0533bfa3572@lear.ch>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:48:57 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: ohttp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ohttp/QI_vNuF_oQgn5sr_6nvcaBqmQig>
Subject: Re: [Ohttp] OHTTP applications I've seen
X-BeenThere: ohttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oblivious HTTP <ohttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ohttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ohttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:49:27 -0000

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, at 21:57, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Should there be media subtypes to define the applications?  I see that 
> as a good question for a WG to consider.

Please open an issue.  This is a reasonable discussion to start, in the spirit of RFC 8558.  I don't see any purpose for such a signal, but if someone can make a case, we could provide a signal.  Note that in many cases the purpose of the exchange is tied to the identity of the resources involved (at either proxy or server), so there is no secrecy requirement for this particular information in those cases.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email