IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Definition of Subkey Revocation Signatures

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Thu, 18 May 2023 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61603C1524AA for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2023 12:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="nRsKrdQF"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="Mq3pxVOs"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Br4WXgB2uBkz for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2023 12:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B31C151533 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 12:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1684438556; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=TC9/EZExRpEWvjsML5A0as8DKgE1dJRICOynt1eZAkA=; b=nRsKrdQFj0RguS0q1sCHj0ZQobyJdSVAuhVQ/9tT+zI+O+75SXHgWpicC5jcmtCMxyoqF WHZQA7xCUpIvSctBA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1684438556; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=TC9/EZExRpEWvjsML5A0as8DKgE1dJRICOynt1eZAkA=; b=Mq3pxVOsXmb8EVAy1jvCO3V/RyzBAVD7l10QCpfWgk0nX8zJuTQur7RlEg5GTsDG7cHTP YdxIapq865H6JzTKSpeH2QFihPGxcmZnpycrq7fN9AvdGhh5PR9mcLYkFN9l7wmJ6tRvc3d bzDMilzINFxJ3UH1mUyuIr8uIK8QXteF6Mavdswes4vrFHXZgV8Wf8pIVJ4sMeilFX45+TX TSDQ0Fq3xs7ClNZNsTrM4nF88wYANXTwaoZI/VlJUA3ctrdkEDqTG9pVEjwEVHxCpjeCvpF 7Xgp7XpYUE4Paka392C+Jq9fkcD86R6cWBCgvvLEEatvgkId6UTrv5QuXPHQ==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B93D8F9AF; Thu, 18 May 2023 15:35:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0823C206F9; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:54:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Paul Schaub <vanitasvitae@fsfe.org>, openpgp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <b850fdd2-69b1-fb18-086e-06c94c0cc13b@fsfe.org>
References: <b850fdd2-69b1-fb18-086e-06c94c0cc13b@fsfe.org>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 14:54:49 -0400
Message-ID: <87zg61h3ly.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/-Ud8uwQGvkiI69HLOciDR42-AJI>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Definition of Subkey Revocation Signatures
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 19:36:03 -0000

On Thu 2023-05-11 10:53:26 +0200, Paul Schaub wrote:
> Therefore I proposed a patch that brings the wording of 0x28 signatures 
> in line with 0x18 and 0x19: 
> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/307

Thanks for catching this, Paul.   There was some detailed feedback on
that MR, and this cleanup has now been merged into the draft.  This is
should (finally!) fully resolve erratum 3298
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid3298)

Well done,

     --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email