IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Revoking Keys: Adding a superceded-by parameter

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Sun, 26 July 2015 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6849E1A1B86 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 03:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eAaHZ-P9JwRa for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FA21A9026 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1ZJIo7-0007Aa-6j for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:05:23 +0200
Received: from wk by vigenere.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1ZJImq-000352-GQ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:04:04 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>
References: <87wpxvjf9d.wl-neal@walfield.org> <87d1zmlv3p.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <87twsyk35z.wl-neal@walfield.org> <87y4i9je9f.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87h9osnswg.wl-neal@walfield.org> <874mks7yx1.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box> <87a8ujoe87.wl-neal@walfield.org> <87zj2j7i34.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: id=F2AD85AC1E42B367; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
Mail-Followup-To: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>, "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>, IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:04:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87zj2j7i34.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box> (Vincent Breitmoser's message of "Sun, 26 Jul 2015 04:45:03 +0200")
Message-ID: <874mkr9qwb.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/1pr27ADIgsh6uvpPuOtjlGzsuhY>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>, "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Revoking Keys: Adding a superceded-by parameter
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:05:27 -0000

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 04:45, look@my.amazin.horse said:

> right next to similar data like "reason for revocation".  We should not

At the meeting we actually started a discussion to remove those reasons
for revocations.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email