Re: [openpgp] Revoking Keys: Adding a superceded-by parameter

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 21 July 2015 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693A1AC401 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QAGIayoD18kH for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB251AC3FC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (31.208.broadband18.iol.cz [109.81.208.31]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AC71F984; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 19:13:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE8F8200E6; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:13:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>, IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <87twsyk35z.wl-neal@walfield.org>
References: <87wpxvjf9d.wl-neal@walfield.org> <87d1zmlv3p.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <87twsyk35z.wl-neal@walfield.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:13:16 +0200
Message-ID: <87y4i9je9f.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/X11KhuQaJ8iIElkZUO1Hawui2Nk>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Revoking Keys: Adding a superceded-by parameter
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:13:21 -0000

On Mon 2015-07-20 22:03:04 +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> At Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:14:18 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:27, neal@walfield.org said:
>> 
>> > I propose that the description field be augmented to include optional
>> > email style headers.  Further, we specify the following header to
>> > specify the new key:
>> >
>> >   Superceded-by: fingerprint
>> 
>> I think it is better to have a signature subpacket or notation data to
>> the same effect.  This has the advantage that it can also be used with a
>> non-revoked key or data signature to declare a plan to supercede a key
>> in the near future.
>
> This is a good point.  Either approach that you propose seems
> reasonable to me.

This is a great idea.  Can you suggest a patch to the 4880bis draft that
Werner started?

      --dkg