Re: [openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 26 November 2020 02:45 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0543A3A0BFD; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:45:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ouu09LFR6pZF; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7193A0BFA; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0AQ2jWWE019463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:45:37 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:45:32 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, openpgp@ietf.org, openpgp-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20201126024532.GU39170@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <160458247450.18017.13134459554784542832@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <160458247450.18017.13134459554784542832@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/F9wR9g2vkEoCLyC85JatOFAzQMA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 02:45:42 -0000
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 05:21:14AM -0800, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Furthermore, the working group will accept no I-D's as working group > > items unless there is a review by at least two un-interested parties of > > the I-D as part of the acceptance process. > > Does this mean that the working group won't adopt any IDs as working group > items unless it has been reviewed by two un-interested parties? If so, perhaps > change accept/acceptance to adopt/adoption? Indeed. Changed in the -02-03. Thanks for spotting it, Ben
- [openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on cha… Benjamin Kaduk