[openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 November 2020 13:21 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: openpgp-chairs@ietf.org, openpgp@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160458247450.18017.13134459554784542832@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 05:21:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/hOMUtjmupv6MQMCnoGkkYjyMJ7E>
Subject: [openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-openpgp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

> Furthermore, the working group will accept no I-D's as working group
> items unless there is a review by at least two un-interested parties of
> the I-D as part of the acceptance process.

Does this mean that the working group won't adopt any IDs as working group
items unless it has been reviewed by two un-interested parties?  If so, perhaps
change accept/acceptance to adopt/adoption?

[openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Re: [openpgp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on cha… Benjamin Kaduk