IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] RSA-PSS and RSA-OAEP for v5

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 28 February 2021 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208543A1BB4 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 12:10:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJ706xTKhzDH for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 12:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98793A1BB3 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 12:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8B5BE3E; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:10:18 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UmwGr3wrfzN4; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:10:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.119] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE2DEBE2F; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:10:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1614543016; bh=hJTQBrTx4eeR7ovdxGVfCQLVacTr/PXJgLWrKzFxsDc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IHxgd6bSUb2U7159bESPs/s659MyruNvHFM5JgVb2arTb3VrUfwHiwvvykKgq5F6u Zl/8O/0VFmzYTokx3xbmDQz2s9iPXKTKIYet998Ua4gOJxTBrDNAWfEgeuMZBBgGDH x3odpPVDy8nwqRTvWxYO8IxVuW2WDJr6VSaJ+k04=
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>, openpgp@ietf.org
References: <YDrbaRiQ34MstP30@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> <87ft1g9goo.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <YDvuaAXgwEDffYbt@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> <6a1649f1-1b64-0a44-7a7d-07dae7b0dc20@cs.tcd.ie> <YDv3k8Oky7dmn2PG@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <4a880a24-9e3c-0832-e48f-28e089150c8e@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:10:15 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YDv3k8Oky7dmn2PG@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZnxdTeCmkJGIzBIeoFLc9BvX71VxErSmi"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Is7TvQoMs31mJwVmzcMMmPonzcs>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] RSA-PSS and RSA-OAEP for v5
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:10:23 -0000

Hiya,

On 28/02/2021 20:05, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Sure, I'm happy to defer this for the moment.  We don't need to make a
> decision immediately, and considering that I just proposed this
> yesterday, we can definitely let folks think about it for a while before
> coming back to it.

Great, thanks. Sometimes these things do get easier based
on earlier decisions, we'll see.

> 
>> If pushing this to later made sense, I guess creating an
>> issue in gitlab would be the thing to do so's we don't lose
>> track of it. (Apologies if someone did that already, I didn't
>> go check just now.)
> I've created one so we don't lose track of it:
> 
> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/issues/22

Thanks again,
S.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status