IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] email death certificates

Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com> Tue, 27 August 2019 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <joncallas@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA10D120130 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIo2gdfLMpV1 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mr85p00im-zteg06021501.me.com (mr85p00im-zteg06021501.me.com [17.58.23.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40774120113 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1566935089; bh=VaQauppkxo7u8xTAhy3A3dhoUJnrWyBD/pMn1EX2XJ0=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=xWUnDdh8AzJzJ+DX//E84/dDUeSQEjNWco4R4Snp63ZTz5I+LpWxktQjICcn5+QGy oDeqfFDTSv0ppoyDKot8fjoTcf5jqrHWjlf7znYmpw2YmMz94Xfys+IHlJGUtpFbxG JnPFCAz9kApp2J5pYdqi9CKHMQKonAaXIg4pUPltPU5SFubjOZvUO9GYCq9qL3XQ2a QRNg2R5oZW8Ml6VaWBEoGzCJSfq5lIlJG1Fa74jhpUZ3qtdLLGrKKHTvvwtBZo6QEu mhFIi33rhMCRMExEjcIRbByZnbYG1Cxtk9I/JQ/wndSKk/w0S8X0pTov0fL92P6ZoM qGpiUTbsu3ouQ==
Received: from [10.125.12.108] (67-207-120-150.static.wiline.com [67.207.120.150]) by mr85p00im-zteg06021501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E180380CDE; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <5409.1566583500@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:44:48 -0700
Cc: Jon Callas <joncallas@icloud.com>, openpgp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1AEEDBA4-B3D8-4356-8904-E1407C7AA4EA@icloud.com>
References: <5409.1566583500@dooku.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-27_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=874 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1812120000 definitions=main-1908270187
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/JEMxfoZRDdvZ6W_1g0eyfWuWFZQ>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] email death certificates
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:44:52 -0000


> On Aug 23, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Has anyone given any thought to this?
> 
> I suppose it might also apply to "does not work here anymore"

Yes, as others have said, designated revokers and reason-for-revocation are part of this, as would be even human-readable notations. 

In PGP, we had key-splitting and those one could with that product key-split a revoker key. It was an obvious use case for us, even.

	Jon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email