Re: Primary subkey subpacket

Timo Schulz <twoaday@freakmail.de> Thu, 15 August 2002 10:19 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA19734 for <openpgp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 06:19:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g7FAAj313565 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7FAAhw13560 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [194.97.50.135] (helo=mx2.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17fHaU-0004R0-00 for ietf-openpgp@imc.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:10:42 +0200
Received: from a62b6.pppool.de ([213.6.98.182] helo=daredevil) by mx2.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05 #1) id 17fHaU-0002Fh-00 for ietf-openpgp@imc.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:10:42 +0200
Received: from twoaday by daredevil with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17fHPp-0000Df-00 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:59:41 +0200
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:59:41 +0200
From: Timo Schulz <twoaday@freakmail.de>
To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Primary subkey subpacket
Message-ID: <20020815095941.GB828@daredevil.joesixpack.net>
Reply-To: twoaday@freakmail.de
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
References: <3D5B5D4B.34F675FE@saiknes.lv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D5B5D4B.34F675FE@saiknes.lv>
X-PGP-KeyID: BF3DF9B4
X-PGP-Request: lynx -source http://www.winpt.org/twoaday.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

On Thu Aug 15 2002; 09:50, disastry@saiknes.lv wrote:

> in which self signature?:
> 
> 5.2.3.3. Notes on Self-Signatures
[snip]

Yes, I'm aware we can't use the self signature but this packet would
need a central place because otherwise it would no make sense. The best
idea is somewhere in a signature which carries the public key because
there is only one public key and this would be central.


        Timo