IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] OpenPGP encryption block modes (Was: The Argon2 proposal seems incomplete (Draft 6))

Bruce Walzer <bwalzer@59.ca> Wed, 03 August 2022 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bwalzer@59.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90E9C14CF09 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikJdnh275FT3 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.59.ca (mail.59.ca [205.200.229.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0209CC14F74D for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (helo=ohm.59.ca) by mail.59.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <bwalzer@59.ca>) id 1oJG4E-000FUJ-Dh; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:13:50 -0500
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:13:49 -0500
From: Bruce Walzer <bwalzer@59.ca>
To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: wk@gnupg.org, justus@sequoia-pgp.org, openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YuqQrQGbp34S5Gi3@ohm.59.ca>
References: <YuAErZRsF/KbOw1s@watt.59.ca> <87edy7keb6.fsf@thinkbox> <YuFc+w02FiRQmHcg@watt.59.ca> <87bktajjvq.fsf@thinkbox> <YuKpxp0/Dy1DfC19@watt.59.ca> <875yjhjg2c.fsf@thinkbox> <87r124m64c.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <YulX9jI1+wOCwLJq@ohm.59.ca> <Q6EUpbQm0e5f1OiU-77Old9p9FXyLCaFZ8pMm7PTt8VTLQJaXRQzWIDSwc3db6yI-56imyOaTNdt9TC8Zrm1jN_kPKxFYH4OqEu6o-Wfquo=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Q6EUpbQm0e5f1OiU-77Old9p9FXyLCaFZ8pMm7PTt8VTLQJaXRQzWIDSwc3db6yI-56imyOaTNdt9TC8Zrm1jN_kPKxFYH4OqEu6o-Wfquo=@protonmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/h7QcO7dgXz0TmYUkCREA-dkddyg>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] OpenPGP encryption block modes (Was: The Argon2 proposal seems incomplete (Draft 6))
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 15:14:03 -0000

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 06:01:41PM +0000, Daniel Huigens wrote:
> GCM is in the same category of constructs as OCB. It is not a semantic
> mismatch to swap one for the other. The name "AEAD" is also not
> (necessarily) exposed to users,

The point is that it was exposed to standards makers, not users.

Bruce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email