Re: [openpgp] Default preferences for the future

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Wed, 22 March 2017 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8263F129BE6 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_TFePBFKFWu for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ECA6129BCB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1cqlDw-0003DH-7Q for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:43:08 +0100
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1cqlAW-0006QT-Al; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:39:36 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
Cc: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <3b89c96a-0bb6-cd09-cbf7-1f9e26f04bd6@addere.ch> <52027.1490051694@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <56ED3B74-0BA4-4DC2-943E-B1CCD1F32AE2@att.com> <11858.1490111702@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <87h92litv6.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <60459.1490194802@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
Organisation: The GnuPG Project
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
Mail-Followup-To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>, "HANSEN\, TONY L" <tony@att.com>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:39:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <60459.1490194802@eng-mail01.juniper.net> (Mark D. Baushke's message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:00:02 -0700")
Message-ID: <87zigdnok8.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=clandestine_Ansar_al-Islam_quarter_ASO_strategic_Adriatic_Defcon_PLO"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ktcbp2F-NZoEaVJLvYgXoABrklQ>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Default preferences for the future
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:43:12 -0000

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:00, mdb@juniper.net said:

> I do worry a little bit that we are adding more flexibility than we need
> today which could make it more painful for all implementations to
> properly interoperate.

I can understand that.  But for sure people will ask for those algo ids
and eventually the IETF will assign them anyway.  Thus we save
discussion here in the WG and move that to the implementers which now
need to explain why they do not want to support SHA3.

Interoperability is only an issue for signed-only documents because for
encryption we use the preference system.  These problems are not much
different than the status quo. 

I won't insist on having the SHA3 code points, though.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.