Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints

Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse> Tue, 04 August 2015 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <look@my.amazin.horse>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A7E1A87B0 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6n0QYU8h2HQg for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.mugenguild.com (mugenguild.com [5.135.189.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83DC41A87A4 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (gate.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [134.169.34.1]) by mail.mugenguild.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A6E65FCE1; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:33:46 +0200 (CEST)
References: <CAMm+LwgTcn8CY+Zk-f9gzXQtMJezG97T+kx2=C7PR5g7zFer_A@mail.gmail.com> <87twsn2wcz.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <CAMm+LwgRJX-SvydmpUAJMmN3yysi4zzGSpO2yY4JAMhD-9xLgQ@mail.gmail.com> <87zj2ecmv8.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <CAMm+LwgKmcTes=V7uS3MjCQixWCo-i7PY=VE7eCHSqt3Ho3OSg@mail.gmail.com> <87a8udd4u6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <sjm61503182.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CAMm+LwgEVySpfL-iN2uzX-4tu7R+isDkHE9D8uAeLTxxd4VxqQ@mail.gmail.com> <sjmwpxc1kbv.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CAAS2fgR6LYck+km5Ze6S9z65ZgsR61d8md2CqojDaceZ0OrZrw@mail.gmail.com> <9c2c8c5df67c83925d7e3c21fe943483.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <CAMm+LwjJ3mdawz92obKRz3NRhbc4veJFgW-u9gvO6sudem=ABg@mail.gmail.com> <sjmoainyzev.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CAMm+Lwgvt6sApNqNsfUZnmhGGEv4bfj+jFfg=-5cNYauSDzPtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Breitmoser <look@my.amazin.horse>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
In-reply-to: <CAMm+Lwgvt6sApNqNsfUZnmhGGEv4bfj+jFfg=-5cNYauSDzPtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:37:45 +0200
Message-ID: <87fv3z6mcm.fsf@littlepip.fritz.box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/kxjpuhh1dKbQCH1UAleYX5r30Uc>
Cc: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>, IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Followup on fingerprints
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:37:51 -0000

On 4 Aug 2015, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> Spending a hundred computer years to insert malware into an open
> source project is a much more probable attack.

Your attack scenario has no implications on authentication properties,
only non-repudiation.

 - V