IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] [internet-drafts@ietf.org] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-10.txt

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Thu, 03 September 2020 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153FA3A0E63 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJ55DJO9D7T4 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A72003A0C33 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LS2VYolEJpN/bhT9hztM0MXfOn8hSzhEbmjDY41wWyI=; b=ETqwRh7rXHyjqY/WNJO3SCizMX UN9x7vyVi3+zWse2TUK9bXygub7EDHjz4L/rKrT6blH7T0+UHQ0sM9HpTG/kLlSCggyimT1+Jw5wr +vi49oMFiXcQlcX4fs0xqnnSouUAdhnO7Ac6v8vz8E4L3TlRmP/TQJkjsX68dBEn5fvM=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1kDrLN-0005iT-BN for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:40:09 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1kDrIG-0000a3-Bn; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:36:56 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, openpgp@ietf.org
References: <87h7sfyr88.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <D354CDA5-ED50-41B4-9B95-3D02A4FC9A4F@nohats.ca> <87363yaojh.wl-neal@walfield.org>
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:36:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87363yaojh.wl-neal@walfield.org> (Neal H. Walfield's message of "Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:05:38 +0200")
Message-ID: <87pn72yiqw.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=broadside_JPL_Industrial_spill_Drug_war_CBNRC_secure_shell_Al_Jazeer"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ombDYh0fuvSpGVPC9Pqq_U6o8cM>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] [internet-drafts@ietf.org] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 15:40:13 -0000

On Thu,  3 Sep 2020 17:05, Neal H. Walfield said:

>     -    included in the Signature packet to provide a quick test to reject
>     -    some invalid signatures.
>     +    included in the Signature packet to provide a way to reject
>     +    invalid signatures without performing a signature verification.
>
> I think we should leave the "some" as just checking the hash prefix is
> not equivalent to "performing a signature verification", which the new

Done in the repo.  Thanks.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email