[OPS-DIR]Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-19
Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 20 April 2025 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ops-dir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.8.129] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211611EA0827; Sun, 20 Apr 2025 10:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.38.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174516957498.1976594.7044867428866882549@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 10:19:34 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: WNO3VYUMZLRZI5BFTRPD2VMHDBU3S2G4
X-Message-ID-Hash: WNO3VYUMZLRZI5BFTRPD2VMHDBU3S2G4
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ops-dir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update.all@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Niclas Comstedt <nco@comstedt.net>
Subject: [OPS-DIR]Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-19
List-Id: Ops Directorate <ops-dir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/htj5MU0lNaRfYbZZLcf2_KSJcoU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ops-dir>
List-Help: <mailto:ops-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ops-dir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ops-dir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ops-dir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ops-dir-leave@ietf.org>
Document: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update Title: Prioritizing known-local IPv6 ULAs through address selection policy Reviewer: Niclas Comstedt Review result: Ready Hi I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I'm not an expert on some of the details in here nor up to date with how common some scenarios are now days vs. others. But I have no operational concerns with the doc, it's well written, clear and it makes sense to me. Some of the earlier mentioned suggestions and nits by others has also been addressed in this version. Regards, Niclas
- [OPS-DIR]Opsdir ietf last call review of draft-ie… Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker
- [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir ietf last call review of draf… mohamed.boucadair