[OPSAWG] A question on the use of "direction" in draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 03 November 2021 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD6E3A10A7; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pacUvhZFsjwx; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C6E3A104B; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id ee33so13565266edb.8; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ab9WwTTRPG/5qQ2uC8mqvPHEH/VqfElAbTnBBMRhOf8=; b=I1yLg6GxO0lIfnS1P9BSgdR5cdlbYkj6Rs4fFCDMTVcH3VWaA5fDpLgZeBizkkmW7P 3pDqKhC+6WmqEx99MzcMCE975Pm1o+tmLecoMipYsoUhGaMWFqCPWF1yct6JDIrq/qbi 4M0hH4XLeB/MVdJnbyjgMAgOhKMAOUN4XPWp805Yr7oS+Ja4OFtDLtldG/9RWIJCQfWo 45uEdnOh1ZI7i4KwMFySNH5AgPjPDHqJgt8871Vz3OzkaKKKDxOYwwi1Oe6vRoWmLf75 63alVYyrnqTYLi6yE0jMbw1z9U2s0jbScZSuTvK2U9Eqp11kBEenoZUwMyUJnk85shiR p3fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ab9WwTTRPG/5qQ2uC8mqvPHEH/VqfElAbTnBBMRhOf8=; b=KiZmvM3gEpNCs4qLxA8715M4qdk9FoxJonxxSd+6yXspSGGOsb2ZU1oAaSUSyHZE+R zWCd/G6+h4FNQGVp13+4KbGsEzFeDeJ1p4OF+NjYHIfSuORmFh169lZ7vhSucFOCtBHu y/Hc/ZDgTvR3y1NMIQeCXPmK/Eb/kM2UfwhI4BYTDFA/g4/gFulXrg1xZ3wiNq4jM3rx 1JLw/n6KT/8kztzv0lXsXaaMtZOXf5I9rQM6eOzLkm31QoS8KLf6DASNjPt7QgbcD42+ 1u4qwKXEb6xmrz46WuAmJByWHrY4HDIkac6TSX5PIFAAw6mn8kb/vI7uQFmHtpn79MyN y3Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KrB4dFYZaO6HHUGcDgkjwYMnitoV20Ek6YkSBHPRNrEzH6uUt c2HBjLQUG/iOQDJL5D/5kJD6M4bAs0DiTVP2aGOOApAC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBsErK7tMBaoNT7Hmnyv4hQckO+knIt29l2GI0vnfceG9UF+3AQHMZVD0exp7jptsR3lTqkeAbn+X4/uqqqyI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:912:: with SMTP id i18mr57423598ejd.131.1635969818560; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 13:03:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVhg+9gs-FTwwx8ZJFeuK=u0xHJ=NoKh6ADyiNyChr4=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e60ab605cfe7e793"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/-cK7Uzni3zuQAHMD7tNWsrGRLsE>
Subject: [OPSAWG] A question on the use of "direction" in draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 20:03:48 -0000

Dear Authors,
thank you for your work on this model. I read the document and have one
question and a single suggestion for your consideration:

   - I find the description of the "direction" somewhat confusing. Can you
   give an example when the "direction" is set to "two-way". In that case, how
   that affects the reported performance metrics. I can imagine that in
   some cases, a performance metric calculated using a round-trip measured
   value. In that case, it is helpful to indicate the source of the metric as
   RT/2 vs. one-way.
   - I may suggest changing default values for percentiles. Based on the
   feedback we've received, the STAMP YANG model uses p95, p99, and p99.9 as
   default values for low, middle, and high percentile respectively.

Regards,
Greg