Re: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 17 October 2013 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DF411E8151 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmrHY4i+5IvQ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A9521F9399 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bj1so3372246pad.7 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jZxUns+Ugqe/pNOu/gY1xycLeEd+QGWCFRO23pdjS0o=; b=tBYZE8+alkAz4wyIx3aliYeoU353prJog151fJv+Kr6XM4nZuhrwkHz+Ozyb+aMLa7 JdEmFudvfsO7xSODAl0wKWpC+7ze8mjcWs6jozPna3J8HMqoU3Am0Iaud0AwLlb147E/ 4oyJar/JvQ3ILiOk5U/IbFGVhI9CSUtdv/Xm/ZkzY8nkBNObQpLPPCdzbhjJ4Aa1OTfz IwBEwS8Mlg0m0m0KTC73xYVrOZmI6oUkaQXuRLt5t1XTvIf7zuvcSLXqgVSZHhuIA5QM rgLJpciYyDT74E0W3gTItMsXvTyLc78CBSh/a+LD6IMYMvIlymTFd0MeTsi/aTMm+TIS 2OKg==
X-Received: by 10.66.180.200 with SMTP id dq8mr19788pac.104.1382044255523; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (63-140-89-93.dynamic.dsl.acsalaska.net. [63.140.89.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qw8sm99889603pbb.27.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5260525C.9050108@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:10:52 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opsawg@ietf.org
References: <20131013061914.31896.77972.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <126539BC-2994-4DF6-9A5C-E66ED691B24D@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <126539BC-2994-4DF6-9A5C-E66ED691B24D@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:10:59 -0000

On 10/13/13 7:05 PM, Hirochika Asai wrote:
> We would like to submit our I-D as a working group draft soon and
> have a discussion in the next IETF as a working group draft.
> Chairs, could you please poll for adoption as a working group item
> on the mailing list?

Just a note that we haven't forgotten about you!  I think we're
generally not very comfortable that we've got an appropriate
level of VM/hypervisor expertise in the IETF to provide thorough,
expert review of the document, although clearly we've got very
deep SNMP/MIB expertise.  So, we've contacted some people
who are not regular IETF participants for feedback, and we're
waiting to hear from them.  You may recall from recent meetings
that we're making an effort to improve document quality, and
here's what Benoit outlined during our session at IETF 86:

	1. reach out to other people for review,
	2. potentially put the bar higher for WG adoption (like in BMWG)
	3. solicit reviews from chairs and AD
	4. if no feedback, kill it. Demonstrate support.
	5. bring the expert to the WG, e.g., as guest speaker.

Melinda