Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt

Keiichi SHIMA <shima@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 17 October 2013 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <shima@wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A27D11E8114 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 01:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkJbk2cen5un for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 01:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sh.wide.ad.jp (sh.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:1001::6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402BC11E80F9 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 01:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:240:11e:c01:970:33f6:da3:a215] ([IPv6:2001:240:11e:c01:970:33f6:da3:a215]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by mail.wide.ad.jp (8.14.1+3.5Wbeta/8.14.1/smtpfeed 1.21) with ESMTP id r9H8tDQb007021 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified NO); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:55:13 +0900 (JST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Keiichi SHIMA <shima@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <525D544E.1030507@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:55:13 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C3FC0802-E10C-4993-8A31-9D28FE3219E1@wide.ad.jp>
References: <20131013061914.31896.77972.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <126539BC-2994-4DF6-9A5C-E66ED691B24D@hongo.wide.ad.jp> <525D544E.1030507@cisco.com>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 08:55:21 -0000

Hello,

On 2013/10/15, at 23:42, Joe Marcus Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:

> In terms of the new notifications, why enumerate all states as notifications?  My original comment suggested a single state change notification where the new and previous state would be available as objects (note: this would require the definition of a previous state object).  It just seems like the way you've implemented it would be harder to scale if new states need to be added in the future.

Ah, I misunderstood your comment.  I did the change actually.

Consolidating all the notification messages (maybe we will have two eventually, one is for a per VM notification, and the other is for a bulk notification) may be reasonable.

# we can even unify a per vm notification and a bulk notification, but maybe it is not a good idea?

If there is no strong opinion for not to unify the notification messages, then we will do the change and resubmit an updated version before the cut-off date (next Monday).

---
Keiichi SHIMA (島 慶一)
WIDE project <shima@wide.ad.jp>
Research Laboratory, IIJ Innovation Institute, Inc <keiichi@iijlab.net>



On 2013/10/15, at 23:42, Joe Marcus Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:

> On 10/13/13 11:05 PM, Hirochika Asai wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> Thanks to comments from the mailing list, we've uploaded new version
>> of our I-D: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-asai-vmm-mib-05
>> 
>> We would like to submit our I-D as a working group draft soon and
>> have a discussion in the next IETF as a working group draft.
>> Chairs, could you please poll for adoption as a working group item
>> on the mailing list?
>> 
>> I've already noticed an error: RFC4133 must be RFC6933.  Please let
>> us know if you find any other errors.  These errors will be
>> corrected in the next version (the first version for working group
>> draft if adopted).
> 
> Overall, I like the changes.  Thanks!
> 
> NIT: VirtualMachineAdminState:
> 
> The destroy(5) state really doesn't match in terms of tense.  What about destroyed(5)?  That said, since this is something one can set, perhaps present tense like run, pause, suspend, etc. make sense.
> 
> Thanks for fleshing out the state definitions :-).
> 
> NIT (maybe a minor issue): VirtualMachineAutoStart:
> 
> Again, tense.  Here, I think past tense works best since we decided this would reflect a read-only state.  I think enabled and disabled work best.
> 
> In terms of the new notifications, why enumerate all states as notifications?  My original comment suggested a single state change notification where the new and previous state would be available as objects (note: this would require the definition of a previous state object).  It just seems like the way you've implemented it would be harder to scale if new states need to be added in the future.
> 
> Joe
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Here, I summarize the updates from the previous version.
>> 
>> * According to the thread Joe-1
>> Modified a paragraph as follows:
>> 
>> The design of this MIB module has been derived from enterprise
>> specific MIB modules, namely a MIB module for managing guests of the
>> Xen hypervisor, a MIB module for managing virtual machines controlled
>> by the VMware hypervisor, and a MIB module using the libvirt
>> programming interface to access different hypervisors.
>> + However, this MIB module attempts to generalize
>> + the managed objects to support other hypervisors.
>> 
>> * According to the thread Joe-2
>> Added description of an example of hypervisor-specific case
>> using ENTITY-MIB, but not modified the MIB definition.
>> 
>> * According to the thread Joe-3
>>  vmAutoStart --> read-only
>>  vmCur* --> read-write
>>  vm*Mem vm*Cpu --> description w/ MUST NOT: "Changes to these objects MUST NOT persist"
>> 
>> * According to the thread Joe-5
>> For the network portion of the hypervisor, added a note on a case
>> equipping virtual switches on the hypervisor as follows:
>>    The objects related to virtual switches
>>    are not also included in this MIB module
>>    though virtual switches shall be placed on a hypervisor.
>>    This is because the virtual network interfaces are
>>    the lowest abstraction of network resources allocated
>>    to a virtual machine.
>>    Instead of including the objects related to virtual switches,
>>    for example, <xref target="RFC4188">BRIDGE-MIB</xref>
>>    and <xref target="RFC4363">Q-BRIDGE-MIB</xref> could be used.
>> 
>> * According to the thread Joe-7
>> Added Notifications for shuttingDown, resuming suspending, migrating, and blocked
>> # I think we still need discussion at this point.
>> 
>> * Others
>> Modified VirtualMachineOperState to be more clear.
>> Revised the description of VirtualMachine*Index.
>> Fixed some typos.
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Hirochika
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt
>>> Date: October 13, 2013 3:19:14 PM GMT+09:00
>>> To: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@wide.ad.jp>, Cathy Zhou <cathyzhou@huawei.com>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com>, Keiichi Shima <keiichi@iijlab.net>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Michael MacFaden <mrm@vmware.com>, Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp>, Hiroshi Esaki <hiroshi@wide.ad.jp>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Hirochika Asai and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Filename:	 draft-asai-vmm-mib
>>> Revision:	 05
>>> Title:		 Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a Hypervisor
>>> Creation date:	 2013-10-13
>>> Group:		 Individual Submission
>>> Number of pages: 56
>>> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-asai-vmm-mib-05.txt
>>> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-asai-vmm-mib
>>> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-asai-vmm-mib-05
>>> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-asai-vmm-mib-05
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>>   This document defines a portion of the Management Information Base
>>>   (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet
>>>   community.  In particular, this specifies objects for managing
>>>   virtual machines controlled by a hypervisor (a.k.a. virtual machine
>>>   monitor).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joe Marcus Clarke, CCIE #5384,         |          |
> SCJP, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, VCP        |||||      |||||
> Distinguished Services Engineer ..:|||||||||::|||||||||:..
> Phone: +1 (919) 392-2867         c i s c o  S y s t e m s
> Email: jclarke@cisco.com
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg