IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 08 July 2019 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DDC12010D; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 05:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4Kyy8cdSM7t; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 05:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5DF212012D; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 05:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562587965; x=1563797565; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=kjx+6zmCZVkueEDXvv0c5S1OTwBecgdXBVkyiduBjbM=; b=glYi6F/W8ccDBm/k/Nmu1hntPucDEXU/ftVcOx4lEb5/QWDa3GWxe7pB zV1HP6nOon1xfjTJgW/W1ElvnQWnt4Z2gO0FNp6OPvhvAgC3HcTswfo0V UXC9vdKGWoOQyDzXfT9rToy3/HAWx2eoijWya6gNA18+lVL6m4VrwUHqV A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANAABOMiNd/xbLJq1mGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUwYBAQELAYEUgWxRASASKIQciBxfi3KHLotEhgIUgWcCBwEBAQkDAQEYAQoMAQGDekYCglo0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEFbYo3DIVKAQEBAwEBASFLCwULCxgnAwICJx8RBhODIgGBew8PqVGBMoQ2AoEPhFcKBoE0AYFQiiWBf4E4H4JMPoJhAQEDgSsBEgGDKTKCJgSUZpVsCYIZgh+BDIMrhCmJBRuCLIchjjGUcIxzgwoCBAYFAhWBUDhncTMaCBsVOyoBgkE+iwiFQT0DMIw1gkMBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,466,1557187200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="14021075"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Jul 2019 12:12:42 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp6619.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp6619.cisco.com [10.61.89.218]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x68CCf4V010119 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:12:42 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <3AF6CDDC-7C4A-4EF6-8B33-A767AA475F76@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DADC0421-A2D7-4425-953B-9CBF5801974D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 14:12:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEE7AD17@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, OpsAWG Chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEE7AD17@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.89.218, ams3-vpn-dhcp6619.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/2mRkaXy5M9XCPp4_wXNpQd9GLdk>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 12:12:48 -0000

Hi Tianran,

I have two concerns about this draft.  First is the intended status of this document.  It currently calls out draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs as an informational reference.  I think the question here is really whether this draft should also be informational.  As a practical matter you really do need to have implemented the other draft for this one to be implemented.  And that means that really it should be a normative reference.  But it would be a downref.  To address this, I suggest just making this document an informational draft, rather than targeting for standards, and make the reference normative.

In addition, I have another question.  Is there interest or appetite for creating a standardized and more version of T+?  If so, is the timing of a standardized YANG model appropriate?

Eliot


> On 7 Jul 2019, at 09:58, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi WG,
> 
> This document was presented in Prague. The authors have addressed all the comments and believe it’s ready for further working group discussion.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zheng-opsawg-tacacs-yang-02>
> 
> 
> This email starts a two weeks poll for adoption.
> If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be willing to review and help the draft.
> If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on this topic, please say why..
> This poll will run until 22nd July.
> 
> Regards,
> Tianran & Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org <mailto:OPSAWG@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email