IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 21 May 2021 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10E3A201D; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mA36mzMZ1xDy; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DADB3A201B; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 14LKo65F013402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 May 2021 16:50:10 -0400
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:50:05 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Message-ID: <20210521205005.GU32395@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <162149688912.26611.7060363738222603934@ietfa.amsl.com> <64ECD2BE-79D0-41ED-A5A3-BA0741D03175@vigilsec.com> <m24kex2xj3.wl-randy@psg.com> <20210520234749.GP32395@kduck.mit.edu> <A050F613-281A-47DC-AB40-1A3AAB69C77E@vigilsec.com> <m2pmxjzxka.wl-randy@psg.com> <901DA114-A874-4097-9939-B2735AE93BEB@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <901DA114-A874-4097-9939-B2735AE93BEB@vigilsec.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/7lH0JaavrHcb-wSkLHoWy7WUX1A>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 20:50:20 -0000

I don't have particular feelings on the last sentence.  It's true that
those characters don't seem to be prohibited, but it's probably still true
that we don't expect to see them.

Other than that, this looks fine.

-Ben


On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:43:04PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
> I guess the last sentence should go away too.  RFC 8805 does not prohibit them, but I cannot imagine them as helpful.
> 
> Russ
> 
> > On May 21, 2021, at 3:39 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> > 
> > so
> > 
> >   The canonicalization procedure converts the data from its internal
> >   character representation to the UTF-8 [RFC3629] character encoding,
> >   and the <CRLF> sequence MUST be used to denote the end of a line of
> >   text.  A blank line is represented solely by the <CRLF> sequence.
> >   Other non-printable characters, such as backspace, are not expected.
> > 
> > ?
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email