IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 21 May 2021 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F292D3A2093; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u5zkcC6OuoY1; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A25B3A2092; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1lkCLE-0001k2-8p; Fri, 21 May 2021 21:05:56 +0000
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:05:55 -0700
Message-ID: <m2im3bztjg.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, ggm@algebras.org, opsawg@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20210521210209.GV32395@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <162149688912.26611.7060363738222603934@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2pmxl12e0.wl-randy@psg.com> <20210520233633.GO32395@kduck.mit.edu> <m2o8d3zxcz.wl-randy@psg.com> <20210521210209.GV32395@kduck.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/iz2oM-t9PKC6au7h8oEHEwbosZY>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 21:06:02 -0000

> Rob should probably weigh in on how much review such a change would need.

once i have the next rev out, we should look at the diff to -09 or so.
i suspect that giving the wg a week to whine would not be inappropriate.
but such decisions are above my pay grade.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email