Re: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7630 (4509)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 20 October 2015 09:23 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913A1B3051 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fXtyTbirSaVU for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEBB1B304E for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7431; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445333023; x=1446542623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=YeaFsn2ov6P1CE//ioKFpb7eBvUsQ6+Ssw+9R7SgATM=; b=RjzGgVjNL2udXtSwiWTtyZOAGqS1dQM9yMwa2DPCTAFQqjTk8mF5C+Vx 4W1WL8eW3JjrmEmBwl07jwvlqVRmLbTno9PMvad2duHOGOlnsLyfc0/5l A0tUKMAudEqIEsk28tX16gNcjRLNGksa4GKIQ8R2kZ5yPnXWVnSea9GLY o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DOAQADByZW/xbLJq1EGoQKb7R7iR8BDYFaI4V7AoFwFAEBAQEBAQGBCoQuAQEEeAEQCyEWDwkDAgECAUUGAQwGAgEBBYgnDTvDRgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARiGd4R+gT2DTAQHhC4Fhz6OZoUZiAaCIIZ4kwkfAQFCghENEIFXPDQBE4VTAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,706,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217";a="612294725"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2015 09:23:41 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.89] (ams-bclaise-8918.cisco.com [10.60.67.89]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9K9NdTV004582; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:23:39 GMT
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, johannes.merkle@secunet.com, manfred.lochter@bsi.bund.de
References: <20151020091258.5C26A182534@rfc-editor.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <56260809.9040501@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:23:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151020091258.5C26A182534@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050909040904070407080004"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/AtTYz86Q33MpN_oypd7o7asZw4Q>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7630 (4509)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:23:44 -0000
Dear all, The facts: - The MIB doctors advised not to publish MIB modules under snmpModules any longer. IANA updated the registry information. See http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-61 - RFC 7360 is published with a mistake. The MIB module should have been published under mib-2.235 (as advised by the MIB doctors) but the document mentions: snmpModules.235 - The IANA registry is actually correct. snmpUsmHmacSha2MIB is under mib-2.235 See http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml - Solving this issue with an errata doesn't work: indeed MIB modules are extracted from RFC, and used within scripts. Discussing with Michelle (IANA) and the IESG, we had no other choices than obsoleting this RFC and re-issuing a new one. Hence this errata and draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new-00. <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-new/> One change to keep in mind for the next version: OLD: REVISION "201508130000Z" -- 13 August 2015, midnight DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published asRFC 7630 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7630>" ::= { snmpModules 235 } NEW: REVISION ... new date DESCRIPTION "Initial version, published asRFC xxxx <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7630>" ::= { mib-2 235 } The way forward is to publish a new draft ASAP with the above correction, to have a one week IETF LC, and to publish the new RFC. At that point (and not before because we don't have a replacement RFC), we will obsolete RFC 7360. Regards, Benoit > The following errata report has been verified for RFC7630, > "HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7630&eid=4509 > > -------------------------------------- > Status: Verified > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> > Date Reported: 2015-10-20 > Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG) > > Section: 8 and 10 > > Original Text > ------------- > snmpModules 235 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > mib-2 235 > > Notes > ----- > IANA registered snmpUsmHmacSha2MIB under mib-2.235 (as advised by the MIB doctors), but the document mentions snmpModules.235 > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7630 (draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-06) > -------------------------------------- > Title : HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 > Publication Date : October 2015 > Author(s) : J. Merkle, Ed., M. Lochter > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > . >
- [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7630 (450… RFC Errata System
- [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7630 (4509) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7630 (4509) Benoit Claise
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7630 (4509) t.petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7630 (4509) Benoit Claise