[OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues
sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Fri, 04 June 2010 02:46 UTC
Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307F53A6870 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2awNH2BVEPcy for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C817A3A6862 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 222A7DB24B; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:46:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20100604024608.222A7DB24B@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:46:08 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
Subject: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:46:25 -0000
This is an informal opsawg working group last call for " Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues" (draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues-04). This is not an opsawg chartered document but we (the WG) agreed to review it and, if people are OK with it, suggest that it be published as an informational RFC using the AD shepherd process. So please take a look and send any opinions (pro, con, suggestions) to the list before June 14th. thanks Scott
- [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv… Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private… gregory.cauchie
- Re: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private… Leo Vegoda
- Re: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private… gregory.cauchie