IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues

<gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com> Fri, 04 June 2010 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D02E3A69F2 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 06:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tV1N6HUjhdC5 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 06:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980F63A69E5 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 06:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 410988B8001; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:24:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFB28B8024; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:18:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:16:54 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:16:47 +0200
Message-ID: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB853526421410186DB72@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20100604024608.222A7DB24B@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues
Thread-Index: AcsDkCsmOFkgBZFNSPKhY0AOGzqo/wAV0Sug
References: <20100604024608.222A7DB24B@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
From: gregory.cauchie@orange-ftgroup.com
To: sob@harvard.edu, opsawg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2010 13:16:54.0992 (UTC) FILETIME=[34004500:01CB03E8]
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:26:10 -0000

Hi Scott, wg,

I just read the draft and found it interesting for all the options exposed and related comments/analysis. I was just surprised for options related to IPv6 to not see any reference to the use of Link Local Addresses, and mainly for the links interconnecting core routers.
Please apologies if the topic had already been discussed as I subscribed to the mailing list a few months ago.

--
Greg

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> De la part de Scott O. Bradner
> Envoyé : vendredi 4 juin 2010 04:46
> À : opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : [OPSAWG] informal WGLC for Additional Private IPv4 
> Space Issues
> 
> This is an informal opsawg working group last call for " 
> Additional Private IPv4 Space Issues"
> (draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues-04).
> 
> This is not an opsawg chartered document but we (the WG) 
> agreed to review it and, if people are OK with it, suggest 
> that it be published as an informational RFC using the AD 
> shepherd process.
> 
> So please take a look and send any opinions (pro, con, 
> suggestions) to the list before June 14th.
> 
> 
> thanks 
> 
> 
> Scott
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email