Re: [OPSAWG] Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 14 January 2014 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF631AE133 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:46:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.038
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.038 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r4OqXg7FBxaj for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F20C1ADFD0 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:46:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7499; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1389717995; x=1390927595; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=nxBKwM60nH+ymdjFsWmUx/0OgqJWk/wTTnoaNXrdSrk=; b=aB+1L54cBf/gvRrw68BpACjlncAbsDJf3vwNeQG1f3wLdMGkSFnQMu7v z6NstFxbYAX0YEgjHhnXAjKJYZ0tQZsqfabYqJvqf31u0qGTA+vm3fVAJ wbTVEhFe3M8kpvHtMzOz0Hm2kjYkl28us6QlrHA1xItTSLMGLQEh70Uii g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkIFAARp1VKQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABagkdEOLsygRUWdIIlAQEBBC1BCgEQCxEEAQEKFggHCQMCAQIBNAkIBgoDAQUCAQGIAA3ENBMEjwcGAYQ3BI45iWWGRYtQgy47
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,658,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="2950276"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2014 16:46:34 +0000
Received: from [10.149.0.203] (dhcp-10-149-0-203.cisco.com [10.149.0.203]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0EGkXlC021606; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:46:34 GMT
Message-ID: <52D569E9.7030303@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:46:33 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Edward Beili <EdwardB@actelis.com>
References: <52D566F0.5030103@cisco.com> <4087887712E5C648B9F72BB9D912FD4602F6D3A4EBF8@il-mail07.actelis.net>
In-Reply-To: <4087887712E5C648B9F72BB9D912FD4602F6D3A4EBF8@il-mail07.actelis.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030901060605010104060406"
Cc: Pat Thaler <pthaler@broadcom.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:46:49 -0000

Ed,
>
> Benoit,
>
> I wouldn't call it focusing, but since I committed I would have to do it.
>
Thanks.  Any time estimation?

Regards, Benoit.
>
> Thanks for reminding me.
>
> Regards,
>
> -E.
>
> *From:*Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 14, 2014 18:34
> *To:* Edward Beili
> *Cc:* opsawg@ietf.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Pat Thaler
> *Subject:* Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 
> 802.3.1-2011
>
> Dear Ed,
>
> The OPSAWG charter says:
>
> (D) Documenting the list of RFCs transitioned to the IEEE 802.3.1-2011.
> Considering RFC 4663 "Transferring MIB Work from IETF Bridge MIB WG to 
> IEEE
> 802.1 WG" as an reference, the following pieces of information would the
> foundation for the document: a table mapping the old IETF MIB names 
> with the
> corresponding new IEEE ones, clarifications/rules on the IETF-IEEE 
> interactions
> (mailing lists, reviews), and clarifications on the intellectual 
> property considerations.
>
> If I remember correctly, you committed to work on this one.
> With the approval of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-07 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis/>, are 
> you now focusing on this new work item?
>
> Please let us know.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>