[OPSAWG] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-11: (with DISCUSS)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-11: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Section 3.2.
This should be easy to resolve but I would like this to be disambiguated before
publication. RFC5844 specifies *two* different options for UDP encapsulation
IPv4-UDP and IPv4-UDP-TLV. Please clarify which of these modes is intended when
the Tunnel-Type is 4

4: PMIPv6-UDP.  This refers to the UDP tunneling encapsulation
         described in [RFC5844].