IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] start WGLC ondraft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-04.txt

"Bert Wijnen \(IETF\)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Wed, 04 February 2009 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF693A6821 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:57:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.566, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3oYz8FtVqMx8 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:57:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (beverwijk.tele2.vuurwerk.nl [62.250.3.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04CD3A67AD for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [87.215.199.34] (helo=BertLaptop) by relay.versatel.net with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1LUeVI-0000Dl-Lr for opsawg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:57:08 +0100
Message-ID: <0D6B0A42F7EE4DA1B50DC45C2990A849@BertLaptop>
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
References: <20090130021022.B4DA312DC3E3@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20090130021022.B4DA312DC3E3@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:56:35 +0100
Organization: Consultant
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0943_01C986B7.3F37D2D0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] start WGLC ondraft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-04.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:57:32 -0000

My comments:

- page 7, section 4
  - speaks about opague. I think you mean opaque (with a Q)

  You may also want to make an explicit statement that those are the datatype
  names as ytou specify them in XSD. I first though they were the datatypes
  as specified in SMIv2.


- Opague (with a G) is again used in the 1st para of sect 5.3 and 
   in the first bullet on page 12 and also 3rd bullet.

I share/support Juergen Shoenwaelder's comment w.r.t. the discussion about 3 documents
in a document set. Where, how is that otehr work scheduled/planned?

Other than that, this document seems fine.

Bert
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Scott O. Bradner 
  To: opsawg@ietf.org 
  Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:10 AM
  Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] start WGLC ondraft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-04.txt



  back on Nov 6th we sent out a WGLC on 
  draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-04.txt

  there was no response to that last call that I can 
  find in the mail list archive (or in my memory)

  we gotta see a bit more interest than that to proceed
  with this document.  

  So, I'll try again 

  this is a WGLC for draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-04.txt
  please comment (one way or the other) by Feb 12

  tnx

  Scott
  _______________________________________________
  OPSAWG mailing list
  OPSAWG@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email