IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 06 January 2014 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F4B1ADF8B for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 03:04:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.138
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.138 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLaJuuFoBeID for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 03:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5E71ADF63 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 03:04:32 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAOSMylLGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABYgmohgQ25SIEQFnSCJQEBAQEDEgsdOBMEAgEIDQgNFAkHMhQRAgQBEggah2IBn2ekBReOXjiDJIETBJ8DiymDLYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,612,1384318800"; d="scan'208";a="37939847"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2014 06:04:23 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 06 Jan 2014 05:55:13 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 06:04:20 -0500
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*
Thread-Index: AQHO8RDEIGF0yyADI0m6OYWIUKl8cJpQjfnQgCLichCABEqxkA==
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:04:20 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129FD648@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <29CE0400-8D3D-4F51-A7E4-D8816361D6CC@kumari.net> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129E249A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F824839A@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F824839A@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:04:34 -0000

Hi Mehmet,

One short reply on one of your answers: 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:mehmet.ersue@nsn.com]
> 
> > 2. We have made an effort in the last few versions and especially in
> > this one to distinguish between the constrained devices and
> > constrained networks, but the clean-up on this issue is not complete.
> > For example section 1.6 still has text about constrained networks -
> > this section and other in which constrained networks are mentioned
> > should be carefully examined to make sure that the focus of the
> > document stays with constrained devices, and that if constrained
> networks are mentioned at all this is in the context of their
> relationship with the constrained devices.
> 
> Why strictly devices? We also have requirements discussing the
> organization of constrained networks from management pov. in section
> 3.1.

[[DR]] hmmm ... the titles of both documents in review start by 'Management of Networks with Constrained Devices'. Is it rather 'Management of Constrained Networks and Networks with Constrained Devices'? 

Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email