Re: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*

Dear authors and all,

I read through the two drafts, and believe the two documents are
useful for operators and SPs that manage a constrained device network.
Thank you for the work.

a) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-use-cases-00

This draft is pretty sufficient at the time of writing. But i do not
know how to act for new use cases coming up. For example, vehicle
communication networks. There are many use case documents in IETF, but
how sufficient they should be. I believe the issue will be raised up
during IESG review.

b) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs/

This document is also pretty sufficient. The requirement template is
very good practice.

One cent to the document is, shall we consider the management of
sleepy nodes in section 3? There are many discussions in coap/lwig for
these sleepy nodes. The management of these devices is rather
challenging. Although there are some discussion in 'Energy
management', the scope of sleepy nodes management should be broader
than that.

Best regards,
caozhen@chinamobile

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully you all had a good Thanksgiving -- if you are in the US, hopefully you had good turkey, stuffing / whatever.
> If you are not US based, hopefully you enjoyed the decrease in email volume while everyone recovered form eating too much. :-)
>
> One of the action items from Vancouver was for us to call for reviewers for:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs/
> and
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-use-cases/
>
> So, can we get some volunteers please? According to our new guidelines we require sufficient reviewers before adopting new work.
>
> The documents are (IMO) interesting and easy to read. Constrained devices have some interesting requirements and limitations.
> If you would like a quick reminder / refresher from the meeting, slides are here: http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/88/slides/slides-88-opsawg-11.pdf
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> indicated that one of his Ph.D. students had read the draft a couple of weeks ago. So they just have to review the changes to the latest version.
>
>
> W
> --
> "I think it would be a good idea."
> - Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg