IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: (with COMMENT)

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 25 April 2023 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C603DC14CF15; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 07:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aH93nmKxtLn6; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 07:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C186FC14EB19; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 07:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1682434342; bh=cExLTZg8Io6KF5oOLa6QrKAYxsRzJ4f+sHwe0OoOEG0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=wi/uZ8/hHdMmsIh3ELr/mdyvkwVOmtDk1msuxZiqeN64nP0o1nuO3DjxZ90dsAQWr ILbebqB4K2RwVbTebmCnZAppKnXpU3+k4pgyMY5f49TdxAuPnxuhsg5kG4A/Ya95VY QSR7ghAdCxl2cHq3ZS9K/+nGZQV2rT6M1c7imTm0=
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0c0:1011::1] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011:0:0:0:1]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 33PEqL30202128 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:52:21 +0200
Message-ID: <d3cac86f-12f0-7f9b-4ff7-19ec2cb94c52@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:52:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
References: <168234431499.14798.154467452140576038@ietfa.amsl.com> <1d4e8263-ed0b-3bf9-9713-2bdee90aac40@lear.ch> <E9FAF855-DEE5-4B4E-9552-662201B48179@tzi.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <E9FAF855-DEE5-4B4E-9552-662201B48179@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/T6MbyoH5kgRkZHcc7hFMwne32fE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:52:49 -0000

On 24.04.23 17:05, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Please explain — do you really need the obsoleted content of RFC 7231 in addition to that of RFC 9110?

Reviewing this, it's probably not necessary since the semantics are stable.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email