[OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: (with COMMENT)
Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 24 April 2023 13:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A1FC152D8F; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 06:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de, bill.wu@huawei.com, bill.wu@huawei.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <168234431499.14798.154467452140576038@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 06:51:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/heMbwVKYPaOl5SOqBEPZwMn3swI>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:51:55 -0000
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15 CC @larseggert Thanks to Russ Housley for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/c_Npcow_0xA8aojaPi07NMcoeaw). ## Comments ### Section 1, paragraph 3 ``` Put simply, we seek to answer two classes of questions *at scale*: ``` What does "at scale" mean here? Ask the questions to a large number of systems? Ask the questions and expect very large results? Something else? ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Uncited references Uncited references: `[RFC8446]`, `[RFC6242]`, and `[RFC8341]`. ### Outdated references Reference `[RFC7231]` to `RFC7231`, which was obsoleted by `RFC9110` (this may be on purpose). ### Grammar/style #### Section 1, paragraph 16 ``` : * on devices themselves * on a web site (e.g., via URI) * through some for ^^^^^^^^ ``` Nowadays, it's more common to write this as one word. #### Section 4, paragraph 13 ``` this device. Publication dates can found inside the SBOMs."; } choice vuln-r ^^^^^ ``` Make sure that the ambiguous verb form "found" is correct. (It can either be the base form "found", or the past tense of a different verb.). ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
- [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf… Lars Eggert via Datatracker
- Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-… Eliot Lear
- Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-… Eliot Lear