Re: [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04?
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@asgaard.org> Tue, 14 February 2012 18:38 UTC
Return-Path: <cdl@asgaard.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A9A21F85F6 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wbs+D-kSqJpW for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asgaard.org (odin.asgaard.org [204.29.151.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE5F21F8622 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07704BA662A; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asgaard.org
Received: from asgaard.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (odin.asgaard.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9yJhDJvxN3t; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fenrir.asgaard.org (50-76-34-185-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.76.34.185]) by asgaard.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBA24BA6617; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2DAB13E7-BEE9-4431-AE73-62974DA6CA77"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@asgaard.org>
In-Reply-To: <2BE690E1-84A1-40AB-9EBB-4FA55B2F884F@cdl.asgaard.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:38:30 -0800
Message-Id: <770BFB63-D0E7-494A-8554-1370AD5C4403@asgaard.org>
References: <2BE690E1-84A1-40AB-9EBB-4FA55B2F884F@cdl.asgaard.org>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04?
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:38:36 -0000
I thought so, but I couldn't find it in the archives. We'll let this run until tomorrow night, and call it. Chris On 13Feb2012, at 15.14, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote: > Greetings, > > I believe that I sent this out last week, but can't seem to find it - so here it is again.... > > The latest draft-ietf-opsawg-management-stds-04 is out and seems to have addressed all the outstanding issues. We have WGLC'd this twice. Instead of running this for a week, can we get anyone who has substantive issues with this draft to speak up in the next 48-72 hours? Say, by Wed night 23:59 UTC? If there are no comments, we will progress the document. > > Thank you, > Chris > > -- > 李柯睿 > Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc > Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf
- [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-managemen… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: [OPSAWG] Consensus on draft-ietf-opsawg-manag… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE