IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes of L3NM/L2NM module discussions

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 29 May 2020 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83F23A00E1 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CBQtVUZhOTJ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9C43A00D8 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2020 04:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 04TBRYRT019862; Fri, 29 May 2020 12:27:34 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CEB22044; Fri, 29 May 2020 12:27:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F49A22042; Fri, 29 May 2020 12:27:34 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.26.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 04TBRW5r017739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 May 2020 12:27:33 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'tom petch' <ietfc@btconnect.com>, 'Italo Busi' <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>, "'Joe Clarke (jclarke)'" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'Oscar González de Dios' <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>
Cc: 'opsawg' <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <AM6PR06MB565337CF2FB735B53D6B52F7FDB70@AM6PR06MB5653.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>, <465E792F-A57A-4AE1-AA0E-E791F7422D74@cisco.com> <DBAPR07MB70168C271FFA086694263208A0B00@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <082901d634f4$071ca270$1555e750$@olddog.co.uk> <DBAPR07MB701619C7BCAE0146BFFA8618A08E0@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <08f801d63513$7435c520$5ca14f60$@olddog.co.uk>, <eb47e7e401624c31bb177d08d583ee7a@huawei.com> <DBAPR07MB7016898208515986AAFBEEF8A08F0@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR07MB7016898208515986AAFBEEF8A08F0@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 12:27:33 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0a1f01d635ac$260c84d0$72258e70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQCwpi9GXLazLV8vDSmdHS8jTf+WIwIakqg5AsN97f0Bnx+RuAJKpxNgArYS/6oC6UvD4QMAXjVKqn7OO7A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.26.18
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25448.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.464-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No-0.464-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25448.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10-0.463600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: nVQUmLJJeybxIbpQ8BhdbPHkpkyUphL9L1Q5MCavUAhPvOpmjDN2knJ2 g7BJb0I1Ro1mfMjLc9R16wNWjDQTa4wpzkUBomXqGJADAbBHGUwpdOqy/RZx7MM5LQWFwBdK4oG ZTeDGv5WayZaoUpklRbN5pka0DGqIFe8qbm+jVKSeAiCmPx4NwLTrdaH1ZWqC4vrbb+Cbm+nefx 4FmMaZTOTCMddcL/gjxlblqLlYqXL/j7RESySxX64TfUg9t2MwhzceWsdlHpFR9vTIXnllauiIG kwuIt+KxCoeW0dT2BaH/JCvitQD6SHK6aCMTbp1ojykM9thkxHDyDYcE1wXmQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/XoINJqkzbP3lOLUlax2-UCnXlHE>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes of L3NM/L2NM module discussions
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:27:50 -0000

> I asked what the four documents were since AFAICT two are published
> RFC, and that has been confirmed.  So what is going to happen to those
> RFC?

My proposal (but who am I to say what will actually happen) was:
- step one: nothing
   The new module is shaped as it would have been had it been created
   before those RFCs were made
- step two: putatively never happening
   If those RFCs are respun at any time, they could make use of the new
   module

Best,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email