[OPSAWG] WTP scan process in draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension-01
Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 23:28 UTC
Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAC211E8103 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:28:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2z66pmCnqHr for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:28:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C339121E80FC for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u16so2083021iet.18 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:28:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zKT41mfP+Es7gbrIVT7BKif3DaQWg2/vAwq7AVPEHxU=; b=VqLU2IzdVcSNKSFkUuKD8kPzcQ6C/I2f/NjlE0CEnzkzACWIAGZ7GP2s+hYYBrZUDs 6wU9kh/8DoacAEt/V54HauOqFLYHIF+Gom4ZtWCk8EexRzlk4WJLeFubTMXQ66KO+kFJ QVzg42McR24OrOFNqFdZkee9KM6vI6yTKGIwL1l3Y8vDpMx4+E3AEJj7FQFnnVHMWKI5 fbDvai3jzg25IeSnMsSovagLg7t33qeOTzuag4G6ZCLAlvOR9A/SuAeBNHTdHHzrqNRs DiNycxw9FT/PpmqwjvBWJXZm9nnlQf3jGyA9YBhif4bI8CrlpO9qQJJ2wHCilvT2v4Q+ 1ilw==
X-Received: by 10.50.106.20 with SMTP id gq20mr4090igb.36.1383866901137; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.69] ([64.56.250.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm68416iga.6.2013.11.07.15.28.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 15:28:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <527C2211.2010005@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:28:17 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [OPSAWG] WTP scan process in draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-extension-01
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:28:34 -0000
I'm not clear on the description of scan only mode. Is it correct that the WTP provides no service to stations when operating in this as opposed to active mode? If so, setting PrimeChnlSrvTime to 0 makes sense, but there should also be an explicit statement that no service is provided. If not, it makes no sense to set PrimeChnlSrvTime to 0. Follow-up question: if no service is provided, is that true until the WTP is reconfigured, or only until scanning is complete? Tom Taylor