Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: (with COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 04 March 2024 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DC4C17C884; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:53:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sp7lMtQzTdkH; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C266FC169506; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686BB3898C; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:53:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AmhiW7jrsoVt; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:53:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C536F3898B; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:53:10 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1709571190; bh=vQ6uEvD+OAj3y8nIm1W/aK5RsV3L10SX+R3w/28B/Ug=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lx0A1ATi5Ym1BtYAI8bv+b8FEjLBahdvGXmfJPKa9WWo2PCAkL16LyAs4ZSXssRbS xytuHSRj7DC1KvyEs0nqFjFDLqa4DgtMJpzbI19yBKUNjZ5oR44MgjhzM4+9zqJkOb RCEkE3WKvsMjWw4GZEZulOwVS6ZX+c4rz2VXx2CY1kagb5tO7k57ITCQAJT1hyJuSP hvvsEAf/Kc3JyjdkiiieoRLZQmFdeiwakmSBxoXXyUFgwBvSTtOmNLd/RKEf15uzg9 HCzPSXgI0tfxZ8BcsWIqb+K+8nLS+RBQ6uqlYW45AVtaz4pgN5aFUDSxRrgxJlq5uZ GIlw4PT8qURLw==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C018524A; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:53:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, opsawg@ietf.org, opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <170942228535.2806.6250850997238862489@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <170942228535.2806.6250850997238862489@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:53:10 -0500
Message-ID: <22291.1709571190@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/cFqgrNlakkjlSIbfEBFkZuMKm6A>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 16:53:17 -0000

Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> ## Comments

I got your nits in my copy.

    > * I suggest finding some text to point to that defines what a
    > "geofenced" name is.  Right now this feels like the kind of thing that
    > everyone "just knows what it means", but could use some formal
    > description.

Ugh.  I don't think we have any RFC that defines it.  It's not in 8499bis.
Maybe someone else has an idea for a good reference.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide