Re: [OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

We would really appreciate any feedback on this document. Personally I
think it is really useful, but we need the WG to review and provide
feedback.

Over the years I've heard a number of people kvetch that TACACS+ isn't
documented -- well, now you can, you know, actually do something about
this...

W

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> Dear Opsawg List,
>
> We have uploaded a second revision of the TACACS+ protocol specification
> which we believe is ready for publication subject subject to port
> allocation.
>
> Please see details below.
>
> The essential difference from the first revision is the change of TLS
> option support using a separate port as opposed to the original Start TLS
> mechanism.
>
> We would be very grateful for the opinion of the list regarding the
> suitability of document for publication as an RFC.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Thorsten, Andrej, Doug.
>
>
> On 02/10/2015 16:25, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>A new version of I-D, draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt
>>has been successfully submitted by Douglas C. Medway Gash and posted to
>>the
>>IETF repository.
>>
>>Name:          draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs
>>Revision:      01
>>Title:         The TACACS+ Protocol
>>Document date: 2015-10-02
>>Group:         Individual Submission
>>Pages:         38
>>URL:
>>https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt
>>Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs/
>>Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01
>>Diff:
>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   TACACS+ provides access control for routers, network access servers
>>   and other networked computing devices via one or more centralized
>>   servers.  TACACS+ provides separate authentication, authorization and
>>   accounting services.  This document describes the protocol that is
>>   used by TACACS+.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission
>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>The IETF Secretariat
>>
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf