Re: [OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 15 November 2015 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5581B4042 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:17:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48_D9-E9i3Oy for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D280F1B4048 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so58263276igv.1 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:17:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pZPETn++/wZ15WIgQsJLDJDXQPSc9mUsVf5n+40a95Q=; b=TisIif4dBK8aN9B9jdtsUe8mnAY5bHs4y3H8Qy/4EoxA+hn7GFrW67yfYGZ3HivZ40 yqQzqviXXnYMLLuBf9uGp4XPy0AZYS5bIhj+0iAy7JdJR96mbAQp9svXGUZO077S6vED A3wEvm39PcPA0jMLR31VKNGJ/EY7l2D0my9uN5WaL8MGgSvWfo7bSwHznyZhanuB88WZ T1WUhSBesQttuLjrOsg1b7WFRjKMsCcNODDwAYQrjsHoCUEPqffjQO3XppVhvuTekXEm taeFo/CZ8fBztxOJqVnw4xi+LprmMj2wvknLn9WaHD5Mi5Z5Ld/ysfOqkhHh5tmYEvVm GOVg==
X-Received: by 10.50.131.229 with SMTP id op5mr10810103igb.83.1447568267192; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from still.local ([184.13.114.26]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 126sm1127351ion.32.2015.11.14.22.17.46 for <opsawg@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Nov 2015 22:17:46 -0800 (PST)
To: opsawg@ietf.org
References: <20151002152505.26594.74925.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D237455F.BC00F%dcmgash@cisco.com> <CAHw9_iKOM5N3-HS3ZOFFaDHYTV7rDaf3YHo-dEmdTU9-4W49aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56482389.20509@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 01:17:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKOM5N3-HS3ZOFFaDHYTV7rDaf3YHo-dEmdTU9-4W49aw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/zrZdCi-lO5cFGIsqtJWWwpXmIC4>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] FW: New Version Notification for draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 06:17:55 -0000

Okay, I spent some time reviewing this document and yes, it's actually 
useful stuff.  it should be adopted.

tim


On 11/13/15 1:37 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> We would really appreciate any feedback on this document. Personally I
> think it is really useful, but we need the WG to review and provide
> feedback.
>
> Over the years I've heard a number of people kvetch that TACACS+ isn't
> documented -- well, now you can, you know, actually do something about
> this...
>
> W
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash)
> <dcmgash@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Dear Opsawg List,
>>
>> We have uploaded a second revision of the TACACS+ protocol specification
>> which we believe is ready for publication subject subject to port
>> allocation.
>>
>> Please see details below.
>>
>> The essential difference from the first revision is the change of TLS
>> option support using a separate port as opposed to the original Start TLS
>> mechanism.
>>
>> We would be very grateful for the opinion of the list regarding the
>> suitability of document for publication as an RFC.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Thorsten, Andrej, Doug.
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2015 16:25, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Douglas C. Medway Gash and posted to
>>> the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Name:          draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs
>>> Revision:      01
>>> Title:         The TACACS+ Protocol
>>> Document date: 2015-10-02
>>> Group:         Individual Submission
>>> Pages:         38
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01.txt
>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs/
>>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01
>>> Diff:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dahm-opsawg-tacacs-01
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    TACACS+ provides access control for routers, network access servers
>>>    and other networked computing devices via one or more centralized
>>>    servers.  TACACS+ provides separate authentication, authorization and
>>>    accounting services.  This document describes the protocol that is
>>>    used by TACACS+.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>
>
>
>