IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSAWG] Fw: Call for adoption, two capwap-related documents

Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2DF21F9919 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AObGOz3rxiA2 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f67.google.com (mail-oa0-f67.google.com [209.85.219.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0EA21F9918 for <OPSAWG@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id o17so913928oag.6 for <OPSAWG@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gKVxOU/iLCkXXnllpo+a46auK5EYPqUE63wkQ+Q8/tc=; b=dO44rpLaAdaLQpvgRu4cxPwiDPi+wbiBk8Qe034Sgq7qHLtxJRC2rOc7MB2jKSx+lr fMUbsh3CNnqy3BqhrHbSq2SdJZdIXwT6MkcW5gUVqV0vMa7zzypIZgYToU6Uy2TBwJlv TMJ67HJoQjIr5XfNTnoFrPLp9ksqTg4SwGLjCUqKSMb0tinRwad/64jttPEFdYtTOn6C DmtQqWS0k2boZIA91+dGDX+kLeo4f+fFDZ+BUCxI5cuTaav72iJEZj7ITlbzPp/dqdqX F+D404r+gg9FagLOA8xSPXDYka9fMToJOrQLSo+PbcvleJ6kY2QGbwdL/6vaGNhUgFel RomQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.136.129 with SMTP id qa1mr17839403oeb.47.1366980146730; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.153.200 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:42:26 +0800
Message-ID: <CABYVfyn1HbuwO0wKQSRybRAcA_WFqnLUqp_jYjRrfQpmk6Bz9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
To: OPSAWG@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b339f1f0f9d8a04db42de05"
Subject: [OPSAWG] Fw: Call for adoption, two capwap-related documents
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:48:58 -0000

Hello all,

I think these two drafts need a revision such as IANA, but that could be
done after adoped as the working group document or during the submission
the 00 version.

I support the adoption.

-Rong.
GSTA, China Telecom


>This is a call for working group adoption of two drafts
>related to capwap use for 802.11n.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shao-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-00.txt
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-opsawg-capwap-extension-00.txt
>
>Since the IETF 86 meeting the authors have gotten expert review
>of their documents and feel that the documents are ready for
>working group adoption.
>
>We'll be assessing consensus on 25 April 2013.  Please indicate
>which draft or drafts you're supporting or not supporting.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Melinda, Scott, and Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email