[OPSAWG] QUIC-LB

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DF33A0ECC for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:30:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oSgkcSQgzLDA for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03213A0F6D for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id w8so3875159ilj.8 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=shwInnKR1WGQYjVlHU8fE1YYAYeljPoTkYWt4RbNvO8=; b=B4eraGJ9E4dfa4vZEJrCDm0tUUlLMdibmned4+z+woabWD01jP2q0z8C62a2HHDZZD 0MjmbbPEB8yu2q2CNK4RqQOqiYeGlgqcg76l85984a1sFj2CtF+yfD5OHPaPwEFaEVrf pP7w6gydJwFaNBpNn0UvSFdAcSCZosX1pGUSl9ohBKr1+sbGRYVpckvSuQpdJ7GLpD2Z 3esM81kLn6ubBXdIPYprXQEHix82q7hyzKbSOFqpgeSC1ZELWzVeXTdTJ90IymVKxX43 P3UOzpRx1wlPchW3E1/7j1jZ4/EQ22H/NV13Kz7TmcEtj7I3k7ka/CyGTxw4sQPIy5gO Mfdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=shwInnKR1WGQYjVlHU8fE1YYAYeljPoTkYWt4RbNvO8=; b=bYkyxueoqUSsHd92nKp70eVgsaBgivwcuB7N9l13AwlcfLE1kxsFmokH7JLSaJhGoE qqUYOc8sY8Tc3VU/6MlHeVR7xo71K3CmVWm1SuG2y/e3kJt3XAHIHVZwmik2Q2YCQa6p BVV8YDAikyTv4FaGZKnKMsXYjTaP/iyirAmdOWNIxp9g9yo3wpyq2wqnT/CVNHtfL/uX F3kV1rzqWoyG61u5iQDRoEdIBd9JPp+WswZg24TB+voNkE9Vv6Ft5w9RJH0HCfSR7uEf NN0IjFwu7EK+SVCT4jkxxNAdZE+WO+9yzoIU+xVoIueBs2mCVOetXRJAReWtPdeKALC0 RYew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vtr1wGji+sbg3kXS56DuVqhUfNRuqQF7E580jHwUNWlVGzbHl BBGsldjDcEtPy+zCGTirvt872/1Wy+RHHPlcYyn4hHUok/E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfNg1S3Bqml/g6RWBWqRUL9/3puisJsuLQx0SZ84CULvWZDPF6yTQRdcvuhRQrK0fvPd9P87HJvcp9vPQrv2s=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:6906:: with SMTP id e6mr5545185ilc.249.1599690635975; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:30:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTHu-tWVjCOcKv5kFr35t7RXUyU0eiUni_uXVRrjFNrRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001ba08005aee900aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/oGeIrDe_J2lwxZqo4GCpPhzrEao>
Subject: [OPSAWG] QUIC-LB
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:30:38 -0000

Hello opsawg,

I would like to call your attention to this draft adopted by the QUIC WG:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers/
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers

Since QUIC is structured to avoid unauthorized intervention by
intermediaries, this is basically a means of server explicit consent to
cooperate with stateless load balancers, DDoS services, and crypto offload.

The QUIC WG is filled with QUIC server implementers. However, there are
basically no L4 load balancer operators in the conversation, so maybe we're
specifying things with no real path to deployment. While we know what the
necessary configuration items are, we don't have the knowledge about what
kind of configuration framework would fit neatly in cloud deployments and
the like.

Is opsawg the right audience to help answer these questions? If not,
perhaps you can point me to a better community for this conversation?

Thanks
Martin Duke