Re: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Thu, 11 April 2013 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB3D21F8C1E for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3w6HEfRx-rw for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6A21F8C1A for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b40so522501qcq.11 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o4LaCKVxK3439pkTZ5JcRNcfp2pqJeLSTbICOVDOiGo=; b=Xc5coUsw/HPW+LVuyEaUh+vaW1zgqNBCHlyq6vH3EpbHFVvMSqEz9b7VV49axQUQkb W4eM7Wh7hXr5wRyYGiR3E26KrvNGt/FfiLMfFAKi8q+jHH4o/tB+PfankQ+WwVk8TuFg GzGsrM/xmHvY2lwPtEJ0wyxa1rswmNGeqLso9C1+oJO6D6IBJwMR5g3MkcKwxKaDz1kE Q4GABo+spZkGIbyQXuiY+Hc/SrXAdzGKZbsKEy1lJZ6thWJindIAv4dzfY49OKd675nP l+v/U4IPmRSb25uiFe/uVoazZ6OI/XOYeN4iyYjxXvV83QpQ+bu6GhyRzeq0Xv7sxMbU aAVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.64.72 with SMTP id m8mr5952021qes.51.1365652150910; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.5.129 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <515A8B2E.9060706@nttv6.jp>
References: <20130328141225.16450.37444.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <515A8B2E.9060706@nttv6.jp>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:49:10 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMEQArg1vNk+6ZF8THbT4WOno1-h3KNiDVA8VAUVjXRHGNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:49:12 -0000

Hello authors,

Thanks for sharing your tests.
Some comments are below.

Section 5.2 provides two formulas to estimate the address multiplexing.
If the formula of static assigment is intended to align with
I-D.donley-behave-deterministic-cgn, it may be amended by adding
active subscriber's coefficient. CGN may only assign static port block
to active users.Meanwhile, log just needs to add one record for each
user.

Section 6.1 states the MCS is highly dependent with retention time of
NAT table. It would be intereted to add some discussions if CGN could
interact with PCP.

BTW, the table shown CGN sets retention time for DNS. would you do DNS
filter on CGN to identify DNS package?  I saw you also described DNS
bypass CGN. Are those related?

Many thanks

Gang

2013/4/2, kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>:
> Dear all,
>
> As I mentioned before, we are testing CGN under the support of Japanese
> Government.
> Now, we've uploaded a new draft based on the result of our verification.
> The useful information about the average consumption of the ports are
> available on the document.
> Please look through it and all kind of feedback are welcome.
> We mentioned Victor's draft "CGN Deployment with BGP/MPLS IP VPNs Draft" in
> introduction
> because part of our research shares the same motivations with it.
>
> The document is *NOT* intended to be Standards Track. It's for
> Informational.
> The wrong description is just mere mistake, so we'll soon correct it in the
> next revision.
>
> The full report of our work will be available soon on the Web.
> We've just finished writing.
>
> Best regards,
>
> kaname
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	New Version Notification for
> draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
> Date: 	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:12:25 -0700
> From: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: 	kaname@nttv6.jp
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Kaname Nishizuka and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:	 draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations
> Revision:	 00
> Title:		 Carrier-Grade-NAT (CGN) Deployment Considerations.
> Creation date:	 2013-03-29
> Group:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 16
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>     This document provides deployment considerations for Carrier-Grade-
>     NAT (CGN) based on the verification result include the investigation
>     of the number of sessions of applications.  The verification was
>     conducted in StarBED which is one of the largest scale network
>     experiment environment in Japan.  A million of subscribers was
>     emulated and it revealed the realistic behavior of CGN.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>