Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds

Massimo Candela <massimo@us.ntt.net> Wed, 03 February 2021 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <massimo@us.ntt.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1205F3A11CB for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:00:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REKMRA07ZqZV for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:00:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail4.sttlwa01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail4.sttlwa01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:110::40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DE73A1184 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (77-164-206-51.fixed.kpn.net [77.164.206.51]) by mail4.sttlwa01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D48AD220100 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
To: opsawg@ietf.org
References: <BN6PR11MB1667D4EB91373CCB7F7A3F5AB8A09@BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <YBhTmPpaH7d/w9L+@snel>
From: Massimo Candela <massimo@us.ntt.net>
Message-ID: <dce40df4-bf34-1197-3810-bdc2c8921dab@us.ntt.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:00:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YBhTmPpaH7d/w9L+@snel>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/uUfTW59QV-QGU78uZPlXOTdcIOI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:00:21 -0000


On 01/02/2021 20:16, Job Snijders wrote:

> Conclusion
> ==========
> 
> I believe with the above I've independently implemented all aspects of
> draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds in one way or another, demonstrating
> the described procedures are correct, verifyable, and somewhat
> understandable.
> 
> The prefix I used is a real-world example, allowing others to inspect
> the referenced inet6num RPSL object, the associated Geofeed file,
> including the authentication aspect. Appendix A was very helpful.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job

Hi Job,

I have reproduced your steps and verified your geofeed.
Thanks for this demo and for your support!

Ciao,
Massimo