Re: [OPSEC] FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

On 7/23/14, 6:42 PM, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
> OPsec WG, 
> 
> Joel has requested us to add a paragraph to the intro of this draft, expressing the concern of several folks discussed on the list. This is the only change from -08 to -09, and the paragraph in question reads: 
> 
>    During IESG review the technical correctness and completeness of the
>    document has been fully reviewed and verified, However, IESG noted
>    that there was no full consensus within the working group on whether
>    to recommend this technique.

Sorry, I'm going to have to apologize becasue reading this again while
not under the duress of the meeting I think it misses the point  (it's
not the IESG) and we need to tweak one last time.

   During  WG and IETF  last call the technical correctness  of the
document has been
   reviewed, however debate exists as to whether to recommend this
technique. The
   deployment of this technique is appropriate where it is found to be
necessary.

> With this, we believe that all outstanding issues are resolved. 
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: 23 July 2014 18:37
>> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt
>>
>>
>> A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only/
>>
>> Diff from previous version:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> IETF Secretariat.
> 
>