Re: [OPSEC] FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt

["Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <[e-mail]>]

Changed as requested. Now version -10. 

--
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-10.txt has been successfully submitted by Michael Behringer and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only
Revision:	10
Title:		Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network
Document date:	2014-07-28
Group:		opsec
Pages:		10
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-10.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-10
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-10
--

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 26 July 2014 13:05
> To: Michael Behringer (mbehring); [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt
> 
> On 7/23/14, 6:42 PM, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
> > OPsec WG,
> >
> > Joel has requested us to add a paragraph to the intro of this draft,
> expressing the concern of several folks discussed on the list. This is the only
> change from -08 to -09, and the paragraph in question reads:
> >
> >    During IESG review the technical correctness and completeness of the
> >    document has been fully reviewed and verified, However, IESG noted
> >    that there was no full consensus within the working group on whether
> >    to recommend this technique.
> 
> Sorry, I'm going to have to apologize becasue reading this again while not
> under the duress of the meeting I think it misses the point  (it's not the
> IESG) and we need to tweak one last time.
> 
>    During  WG and IETF  last call the technical correctness  of the document
> has been
>    reviewed, however debate exists as to whether to recommend this
> technique. The
>    deployment of this technique is appropriate where it is found to be
> necessary.
> 
> > With this, we believe that all outstanding issues are resolved.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >> Sent: 23 July 2014 18:37
> >> To: [e-mail];
> >> [e-mail];
> >> [e-mail]
> >> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09.txt
> >>
> >>
> >> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only/
> >>
> >> Diff from previous version:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-09
> >>
> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> >>
> >> IETF Secretariat.
> >
> >
>