IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-00.txt

"Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 25 February 2009 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <manav@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AA13A6A08 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:40:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u+Rs0NMPsHIx for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:40:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail5.alcatel.fr (smail5.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E6E3A680A for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:40:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail5.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id n1P3eKlA006520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:40:22 +0100
Received: from INBANSXCHHUB01.in.alcatel-lucent.com (135.250.12.32) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:40:20 +0100
Received: from INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.38]) by INBANSXCHHUB01.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.32]) with mapi; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:09:04 +0530
From: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" <manav@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:09:03 +0530
Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcmWpWSA1CerDfU3Q0eUdd4wEOcU6AAU8r7Q
Message-ID: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8357913FE76@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <799B94C1-0CDD-45D6-9EA5-AFBDAC3A3ABF@extremenetworks.com> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8357913FE45@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <EDCA00B0-7F2F-4CAB-A376-671008E5D421@extremenetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDCA00B0-7F2F-4CAB-A376-671008E5D421@extremenetworks.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.13
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:40:11 -0000

Ran,

I went through the archives for your comments on this draft (draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-00.txt) and could only find one, where you suggested that we must also include a study of OSPF with digital signatures in this draft. Is this all, or am I missing something? 

Most of the discussion in the past was around whether the WG is correct in recommending HMAC-SHA over MD5/HMAC-MD5 or not. If you still want to address this issue then please use a different thread, as that's related to the other draft (draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements) and not the one that this email is originally about.

Cheers, Manav

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of RJ Atkinson
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10.58 PM
> To: opsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] 
> draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-00.txt
> 
> 
> On  24 Feb 2009, at 12:22, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
> > Weren't your comments addressed to the minutes that were posted on  
> > the list?
> 
> The minutes discussing the drafts -- so they apply also
> to the drafts.   I think revised I-Ds taking those
> comments into consideration would be very helpful.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ran
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email