[OPSEC] comments: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 18 April 2010 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112BA28C132 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.811, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GRli0f8nfPol for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4EB28C133 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.101] (m455636d0.tmodns.net [208.54.86.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3IIdBxc029922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:39:26 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4BCB50A5.9010805@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:34:13 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100404 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "'opsec@ietf.org'" <opsec@ietf.org>, David Dugal <ddugal@juniper.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:39:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [OPSEC] comments: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:39:38 -0000
Some thoughts as a contributor not as working group chair...
I'd like to see the configuration examples in appendix a and b extended
to handle the ipv6 case as well.
In the juniper section I think the icmp rule is missing a directive:
term icmp {
from {
protocol icmp;
}
policer 2Mbps;
^
then?
then accept;
}
at least with the router I have to the lab running 10.1 it doesn't
accept that stanza as written.
- [OPSEC] comments: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-contr… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [OPSEC] comments: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-c… David Dugal