Re: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for makingdraft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document
"Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@qwest.com> Fri, 09 January 2009 18:38 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092293A6883; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:38:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541AB3A67FC for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:38:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZeAbudR8vUV for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from suomp64i.qwest.com (suomp64i.qwest.com [155.70.16.237]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F603A6883 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from suomp61i.qintra.com (suomp61i.qintra.com [151.117.69.28]) by suomp64i.qwest.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n09IcKnF012466; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:38:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ITDENE2KSM01.AD.QINTRA.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by suomp61i.qintra.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n09IcEYS021974; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:38:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: from qtdenexhtm20.AD.QINTRA.COM ([151.119.91.229]) by ITDENE2KSM01.AD.QINTRA.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:38:14 -0700
Received: from qtdenexmbm24.AD.QINTRA.COM ([151.119.91.226]) by qtdenexhtm20.AD.QINTRA.COM ([151.119.91.229]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:38:14 -0700
From: "Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@qwest.com>
To: Bruno ROHEE <bruno.rohee@oppida.fr>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:38:08 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for makingdraft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document
Thread-Index: AclydGmf5dBv2rD4SimZhizqbRVXUQAFL3WFAAAQ434=
Message-ID: <FD6E9372-5ABA-45BF-BD4A-6FD1443A8C2E@mimectl>
References: <72F9DD55D83BC743801AA2BCEE815AFA0330B6@PATATUM3.oppida.fr>
In-Reply-To: <72F9DD55D83BC743801AA2BCEE815AFA0330B6@PATATUM3.oppida.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V8.1.240.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2009 18:38:14.0481 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E629410:01C97289]
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for makingdraft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
I too feel draft-gont-opsec-ip-security is a good start and should be included as a WG item. If it is adopted I will provide comments on this work. Donald.Smith@qwest.com<mailto:Donald.Smith@qwest.com> Please cc the handlers to keep them all in the loop. ________________________________ From: opsec-bounces@ietf.org [opsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bruno ROHEE [bruno.rohee@oppida.fr] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:07 AM To: opsec@ietf.org Subject: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for makingdraft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document I think an up to date, vendor neutral document summarizing current issues and best practices with IP could be invaluable for both users and implementers. Fernando’s draft is a very good start toward that goal and should IMHO become a WG item. Bruno, a not completely neutral party as he submitted potential improvements _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] Voicing my support for making draft-gont-… Bruno ROHEE
- Re: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for makingdraft-go… Smith, Donald