[OPSEC] Voicing my support for making draft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document
"Bruno ROHEE" <bruno.rohee@oppida.fr> Fri, 09 January 2009 17:33 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC9D28C19A; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:33:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45933A6A70 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:08:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.368
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.016, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id st49DnoWd17r for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp02.msg.oleane.net (smtp02.msg.oleane.net [62.161.4.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D686C3A6358 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oppida.cesti.fr (173-118.252-81.static-ip.oleane.fr [81.252.118.173]) by smtp02.msg.oleane.net (MTA) with ESMTP id n09G82pL022070 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:08:02 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.7.2 smtp02.msg.oleane.net n09G82pL022070
Authentication-Results: smtp02.msg.oleane.net; dkim=none (no signature) header.i=unknown; dkim-adsp=none
X-Oleane-Rep: REPA
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by oppida.cesti.fr id n09GKMn0019573 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:20:22 +0100
Received: from UNKNOWN(192.168.3.250), claiming to be "PATATUM3.oppida.fr" via SMTP by oppida, id smtpdxxoYoc; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:20:16 +0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:07:47 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
Message-ID: <72F9DD55D83BC743801AA2BCEE815AFA0330B6@PATATUM3.oppida.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Voicing my support for making draft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document
Thread-Index: AclydGmf5dBv2rD4SimZhizqbRVXUQ==
From: Bruno ROHEE <bruno.rohee@oppida.fr>
To: opsec@ietf.org
X-PMX-Spam: Probability=8%
X-PFSI-Info: PMX 5.5.0.356843, Antispam-Engine: 2.6.1.350677, Antispam-Data: 2009.1.9.155221 (no antivirus check)
Subject: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for making draft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 a WG document
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0897205025=="
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
I think an up to date, vendor neutral document summarizing current issues and best practices with IP could be invaluable for both users and implementers. Fernando's draft is a very good start toward that goal and should IMHO become a WG item. Bruno, a not completely neutral party as he submitted potential improvements
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] Voicing my support for making draft-gont-… Bruno ROHEE
- Re: [OPSEC] Voicing my support for makingdraft-go… Smith, Donald