[OPSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6274 (4494)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 06 October 2015 17:11 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8331ACF54 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvMw4LjA3HQ3 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6B61ACF24 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id ECDED180208; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: fernando@gont.com.ar, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, gunter@vandevelde.cc, evyncke@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20151006171017.ECDED180208@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:10:17 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/KI-ykNbKFFmoJ0cZnrMKDA9V0fA>
Cc: alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com, opsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OPSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6274 (4494)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 17:11:30 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6274, "Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol Version 4". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6274&eid=4494 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com> Section: 3.6 Original Text ------------- In Figure 3, an attacker sends ... Corrected Text -------------- In Figure 5, an attacker sends ... Notes ----- Text immediately below Figure 5 incorrectly references to incorrect figure number 3. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6274 (draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol Version 4 Publication Date : July 2011 Author(s) : F. Gont Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6274 (4494) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OPSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6274 (… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [OPSEC] [Errata Verified] RFC6274 (4494) RFC Errata System