IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] 3 Volunteers wanted - Draft: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

"Lee Howard" <lee@asgard.org> Tue, 14 August 2012 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@asgard.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B89F21F8569 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzgPp2uaUFlr for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr4.networksolutionsemail.com (omr4.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2EB21F8794 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr7 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr4.networksolutionsemail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7EIwcxV028910 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:58:38 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr7 smtp.user=lee@asgard.org; auth=pass (LOGIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: lee@asgard.org
Received: from [204.235.115.163] ([204.235.115.163:34569] helo=HDC00042402) by cm-omr7 (envelope-from <lee@asgard.org>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id CE/32-21064-EDF9A205; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:58:38 -0400
From: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
To: "'Eric Vyncke (evyncke)'" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "'Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)'" <gvandeve@cisco.com>, opsec@ietf.org, 'v6ops v6ops WG' <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240674C2@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com> <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E10C3A2A@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <97EB7536A2B2C549846804BBF3FD47E10C3A2A@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:58:37 -0400
Message-ID: <001f01cd7a4e$d05c7390$71155ab0$@asgard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0020_01CD7A2D.494D4490"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGGlPLakFxZCTrqhE95LHJwbjJ3AQK/mXl8l9F08BA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:18:29 -0700
Cc: 'Fernando Gont' <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] 3 Volunteers wanted - Draft: draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:58:41 -0000

 

 

From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 4:43 AM
To: Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve); opsec@ietf.org; v6ops v6ops WG
(v6ops@ietf.org)
Cc: Fernando Gont
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] 3 Volunteers wanted - Draft:
draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

 

-       1.0 please avoid all discussion about NAPT being 'minimal/simple'
security, the days of scanning are over and have been replaced by malware
download/email propagated

 

 

This is demonstrably false, and I can send you logs of scanning attempts
foiled by NAPT.  NAT is crap security, but it's not zero security.  

 

Lee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email