Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Mon, 14 October 2019 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7621208B5 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IiOPUfPGF47N for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141081208B3 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id x4so13596875qkx.5 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5dKNVhabstqpYf5ASHsAgdBY3a4uSZRgmbqsc3frn+o=; b=Wx8jc4xzWBbt/ZtNWGJPcqMYBiiIIFVew9A3t9L781p4y53OQkUlWa9uaOXEB2zltN UxtPHYaXbKC1yGZVH3D7XYTw61lyOdZ9SyvmZSzybWnE/99FukdY2dzQ/101RTerf8h1 kJ/750hMbuF2rgA6qmtHWoNCZffeXMZ9VQw2Jx/ffuWk1gv3UHd4EwisYSsO6bZX/0LU bG8WgTFhVBryj00hmLAemQypFBb+9/mcgDbz9SONH7C2TPJXxgvyyLzNsuimQ46j6HQ3 5UMaxcBCkmS2sbk8mQaLUQNe9SXWQ3leY1BJZ4V8rqz67o3DqBTmvEZX8yjadxEfg9cc pp0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5dKNVhabstqpYf5ASHsAgdBY3a4uSZRgmbqsc3frn+o=; b=Oc6scKh74qVLGTVZWMbec/msNIs/VZ/tamgHduNbC3dct+SSGLu1zfbKlb3lSao7gJ 1oVFz9zYfJ9VV+fi0CxbH2pMmupcYH4LesEog5ClaFMcMqbnj39mcRK4g4a25aZ/VzRK /HScTaH9ICWPleuZfELUVz5t2An5MCZ0wdCkvIpnGtzDLZJHZ9/96bxsb5BqI44+8CeG Jan0iYVGHhgCIW8V7RjuHIOg3xXKTXMHtHXBFSfYj+fEdtCkYKOcfUvaCjOL3vBCjo1H QQoBp9pywSswGb/RXhaT6qxUNNZt3KqmX+kf1Lj8YNgfe0VtoQ1NGCBh1k9x8s1LCq4n NHpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUP/pL1jBxcc3NSiAMVgk+55fCToWFB47MPw3gWiaB1VB7gd1PG quW9Rio4y6hq0hJ6aoYaFEIx2qcc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqynGDzJpPDVVBDbKi2zgdIBoNoFBCIitM3cJKM9AEdW8kj29NpAWOQmJZ5EnL3zfbgYNmWKnw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:67d4:: with SMTP id b203mr26857631qkc.435.1571097274592; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1003:b108:7d8c:286e:a6d3:4ac9:6605? ([2600:1003:b108:7d8c:286e:a6d3:4ac9:6605]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm8289024qtr.17.2019.10.14.16.54.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusaGSM@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB56997470CC6BB671C949202CAE900@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:54:33 -0400
Cc: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C215E3D8-F896-442E-B5A3-DF112B0ED869@gmail.com>
References: <157086559138.1393.1472645196672102960@ietfa.amsl.com> <AD406E0A-4CAF-44FE-A583-3A6E4E4A0FD4@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB56997470CC6BB671C949202CAE900@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/WBkgnQpVoSbv4sAxYUrNqZFkkwE>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:54:39 -0000

Ron

I read the document thoroughly in its entirety and do have valuable real world experience in this space so I am volunteering.

Not sure what I am getting myself into.😀

Gyan

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 14, 2019, at 7:14 PM, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Jen,
> 
> I am ready to request publication. But before we do that, we need a document shepherd.
> 
> Eric,
> 
> Was there anyone who was close to the draft, but not a co-author. We can victimteer that person.
> 
>                                                      Ron
> 
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com> 
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 3:41 AM
> To: opsec@ietf.org
> Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>om>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
> 
> As you will notice in https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$  this latest revision addresses a suggestion by Gyan Mishra issued during the Working Group Last Call. Other changes are mainly replacing the normative "MUST" and "SHOULD" as it is an informational document (so it is now "must" and "should") + removing an unused informational reference.
> 
> Jen and Ron, as the authors have addressed all comments received during the WGLC (actually by only one reviewer) and the extensive review by Jen, may I kindly request publication of this document?
> 
> Thank  you all
> 
> -éric -merike - kk -enno
> 
> 
> On 12/10/2019, 09:34, "OPSEC on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" <opsec-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>    This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF.
> 
>            Title           : Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks
>            Authors         : Eric Vyncke
>                              Kiran K. Chittimaneni
>                              Merike Kaeo
>                              Enno Rey
>        Filename        : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
>        Pages           : 52
>        Date            : 2019-10-12
> 
>    Abstract:
>       Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is
>       available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal
>       network.  However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges.  RFC
>       4942 describes the security issues in the protocol but network
>       managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to
>       enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices.
> 
>       This document analyzes the operational security issues in several
>       places of a network (enterprises, service providers and residential
>       users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigations techniques.
>       Some very specific places of a network such as the Internet of Things
>       are not discussed in this document.
> 
> 
>    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVgtmnGd$ 
> 
>    There are also htmlized versions available at:
>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCQdAq-nG$ 
>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCTaFWv3h$ 
> 
>    A diff from the previous version is available at:
>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$ 
> 
> 
>    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCXkuUebd$ 
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    OPSEC mailing list
>    OPSEC@ietf.org
>    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVjA-7t2$ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec