Re: [OPSEC] noted: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-00

Rodney Dunn <rodunn@cisco.com> Mon, 11 January 2010 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rodunn@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EBA3A6824 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:42:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cRZtiEJo7Y8M for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:42:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAE43A67F4 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:42:27 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0BIgMOU022145; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:42:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp-64-102-157-217.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-157-217.cisco.com [64.102.157.217]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0BIgMja018958; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:42:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B4B710E.6010406@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:42:22 -0500
From: Rodney Dunn <rodunn@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@qwest.com>
References: <4B42CE9B.8070505@bogus.com> <92c950311001061023i39dd830eqd4fe2568f7106400@mail.gmail.com> <B01905DA0C7CDC478F42870679DF0F1007542DD592@qtdenexmbm24.AD.QINTRA.COM>
In-Reply-To: <B01905DA0C7CDC478F42870679DF0F1007542DD592@qtdenexmbm24.AD.QINTRA.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'opsec@ietf.org'" <opsec@ietf.org>, "'cpignata@cisco.com'" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] noted: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-00
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rodunn@cisco.com
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:42:28 -0000

Thanks Donald. We do appreciate any and all feedback and review comments.

You can reach all of us via:

draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane@tools.ietf.org

Or unicast any of us and we'll get together on the feedback.

Rodney




On 1/6/10 2:26 PM, Smith, Donald wrote:
> I am certainly not an IETF expert so will leave that to others but I found the document to be interesting and valuable.
> Most router vendors will NOT provide cpp numbers to ISPs. Other ISPs have asked me what numbers we are using on the Qwest network so ISPs are interested in something like this with actual values in it and the reasoning behind those values.
>
> I would be willing to review and provide comments on this draft!
>
> (coffee != sleep)&  (!coffee == sleep)
> Donald.Smith@qwest.com gcia
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: opsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Glen Kent
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 11:24 AM
>> To: Joel Jaeggli
>> Cc: cpignata@cisco.com; opsec@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] noted: draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-00
>>
>> I read the draft and i am not sure i understand the motivation of why
>> this needs to get published as an IETF standard.
>>
>> Am i missing something here?
>>
>> Glen
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Joel Jaeggli
>> <joelja@bogus.com>  wrote:
>>> I notes with interest today the initial publication of:
>>>
>>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-00
>>>
>>> for which I am certain review and feedback would be greatly
>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> joel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OPSEC mailing list
>>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>
>
> This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
> privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication
> in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the communication and any attachments.
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec